Jehovah's Witnesses link to UN queried
Sect accused of hypocrisy over association with
organisation it has demonised.
Stephen Bates, religious affairs correspondent
Monday October 8, 2001
The Guardian
The United Nations is being asked to investigate why it has granted
associate status to the Jehovah's Witnesses, the fundamentalist
US-based Christian sect, which regards it as the scarlet beast predicted
in the Book of Revelation.
Disaffected members of the 6m-strong group, which has 130,000 followers
in the UK, have accused the Witnesses' elderly governing body of
hypocrisy in secretly accepting links with an organisation that
they continue to denounce in apocalyptic terms.
The UN itself admitted yesterday that it was surprised that the
sect, whose formal name is the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society
of New York, had been accepted on its list of non-governmental organisations
for the last 10 years.
A former member said: "There is a glaring inconsistency which
has emerged between the WTBTS's frequent portrayal of the UN as
an evil organisation and its behind-the-scenes attempts to curry
favour with that organisation. Were individual members to be aware
of any formal link they would be devastated.
"By no stretch of the imagination could the WTBTS be considered
to share the ideals of the UN charter unless you suppose that destruction
of the UN by God is consistent with that charter."
The Witnesses, most frequently encountered by non-members when
they attempt to make doorstep conversions, have faced accusations
of bad faith before.
These have been most notably over the hierarchy's insistence that
members should not accept blood transfusions and over accusations
that sexual abuse of children by Witnesses' ministers in the US
have been covered up.
Followers who criticise the Witnesses' leaders or question their
decisions are routinely "disfellowshipped" which means
fellow members including their families must shun them.
An obscure and ill-publicised decision by the hierarchy in New
York last year modifying the prohibition on transfusions by deeming
that God had revealed to them that transfusions of some blood components
might be acceptable, providing there was later repentance, has come
too late for many hundreds of followers known to have died because
they refused blood.
In child abuse cases, the hierarchy insists there must be two independent
witnesses - an almost impossible stipulation - before accusations
are investigated.
The Watchtower Society has been denouncing the UN and its predecessor
the League of Nations for 80 years, believing them to be a world
empire of false religion, predicted in the Book of Revelation.
A recent publication since the organisation obtained its recognition
describes the UN as "a disgusting thing in the sight of God
and his people".
In an internal document, the WTBTS describes its policy as a "theocratic
war strategy". It claims: "In time of spiritual warfare
it is proper to misdirect the enemy by hiding the truth. It is done
unselfishly; it does not harm anyone; on the contrary it does much
good."
Being a recognised NGO with the United Nations - as more than 1,500
organisations are - gives status though not grants.
To qualify, organisations must show that they share the ideals
of the charter, operate on a non-profit basis, "demonstrate
interest in UN issues and proven ability to reach large or specialised
audiences" and have the commitment and means to conduct effective
information programmes about UN activities.
Disaffected Witnesses believe that the association, which has not
been publicised to followers, is intended to increase the cult's
respectability to sceptical governments, such as France's, which
have refused to recognise it.
Paul Gillies, the Witnesses' spokesman in Britain, said: "We
do not have hostile attitudes to governing bodies and if we are
making representations on issues to the UN we will do so."
"There are good and bad bodies just as there are good and
bad politicians. We believe what the Book of Revelation tells us
but we do not actively try to change the political system."
A spokeswoman for the UN said: "I think we may not be aware
of their attitude, which seems to be really strange."
(This article appeared on The
Guardian)

|