
Comment by cyncarteddy (Comment ID: 298699)
[url=http://janetharris.678host.com/survival1460.html] Maps [/url]
Posted on January 22, 2008 at 10:01 am

Comment by playpefifleta (Comment ID: 295251)
[url=http://nanniewatson.fatfreehost.com/bus5952.html]1[/url]
Posted on January 9, 2008 at 9:11 am

Comment by DrinyDiluer (Comment ID: 288804)
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:
Posted on December 18, 2007 at 3:11 am

Comment by DrinyDiluer (Comment ID: 286126)
I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting!
Posted on December 8, 2007 at 5:27 am

Comment by jeffersonwhite (Comment ID: 284222)
XANAX Tablets were compared to placebo in double blind clinical studies (doses up to 4 mg/day) in patients with a diagnosis of anxiety or anxiety with associated depressive symptomatology.
More about Xanax pills - [url=http://students.sessions.edu/userprofile.php?u=buy-xanax]buy Xanax[/url] (http://students.sessions.edu/userprofile.php?u=buy-xanax )
Posted on November 28, 2007 at 4:15 pm

Comment by ignodaunloalm (Comment ID: 271747)
The old order. You can see
[url=”
http://sat-erotik.eroshow.biz/map.html”]here[/url]
Posted on October 4, 2007 at 12:59 pm

Comment by Help (Comment ID: 179101)
Could someone please explain to me why I cannot access the latest comment by double clicking and going directly to the comment. When I click I access the information and not the comment. A lot of time is spent scrolling through until I find the date of submission. Thank you
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 12:06 am

Comment by Chad (Comment ID: 179110)
To Help:
this sometimes happens if a comment is not put at the end but somewhere in the middle, so it is on a previous page.
What I do is, I click on “show all” and then use “Find on this page” under the “Edit” menu in internet explore. I type in the first few words of the comments, press “Find next”, and there it is
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 12:19 am

Comment by James NON-JW (Comment ID: 179197)
I agree with Clinton, however this is an issue that can be resolved by the webmaster. How about that Rado?
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 3:07 am

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 179387)
Sorry to butt in, James, I wonder if you saw the note I wrote for you yesterday…
I know it is a bit long, but perhaps you find the time to read it and give me an answer?
Thanks
Mark
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 8:29 am

Comment by James NON-JW (Comment ID: 179558)
Hello Mark, thanks for your note to me along with others here.
Yes, I did read your suggestions and do think the concept has merit, however in my case, I have employed a very similar methodology with my family, only to find that I would bang my head against the wall at some point.
Most assuredly in the case of one family member in particular, I honestly believe that I have made inroads into the whole cult psyche thing, yet despite this I realize a lot of their inability to come to grips with the whole problem is more related to pride now more than anything.
Interesting juxtaposition isn’t it?
The JW faith dogmatically berates other faiths/secular ideologies, yet even when you lovingly (or through your ideas) disprove their long-held dream world scenario as nothing more than a man-made conjured up world, their pride won’t allow them to accept it. In the aforementioned case, it would seem that they are content to live the rest of their life in an organization that can easily be proven to spread falsehoods.
For those that deep down within their soul have acknowledged that this faith is false, this is their comfort zone, how would many of the JW clan make a stand and do what they know to be right?
Hypocritically, many of this faith will be quick to point out how other others and/or JW aren’t strong, yet the reality is that they are not capable of doing the right thing themselves.
This is part of the whole concept revealing my belief that this is one of the ultimate ‘lip service’ religions. They have always been concerned with image rather than real substance. How do many of them ever deal with the internal issues openly?
During my time with this religion, I noticed that everything is hidden, never actually handling or dealing with the real meat of the matter. Before any concrete & positive development can transpire, all you will hear before long is the usual statements like: “Don’t discuss as this will hurt God’s name/org.” or “Don’t bring reproach on God’s org.”.
These are actually generated by the Watchtower, who is more concerned with the protection of their image, than discussing any matter. Leave it to them to deal with right?
In some areas this is extremely pathetic. No more is this an unfortunate case than with the pedophile problem. If you are relying on an uneducated group of unqualified people sitting in their ivory tower to fix the pedophile problem or any other important matter, you might want to rethink your position. Similar to governmental control, when we allow other remote groups (especially big operations) to fix our problems for us, you will invariably be disappointed.
Thanks again Mark and I do not give up on using a similar manner to work with people of this faith, getting them to re-use their God-given brain is part of the problem.
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 2:17 pm

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 179646)
Hi James,
good to hear from you. I think I understand what you are getting at.
Perhaps this silly story will through some light on the very problem:
I went today to do my motorcycle driving test, I failed because I was going too slowly all the time, mainly because the examiner was following me like the plague.
I don’t really need a motorccyle licence, because I have a car anyway, but I have spent a lot of money on the training, so I already booked a re-test. In a sense, I am trapped in this: unless I want to admit to myself that I am crap motorcycle rider and have wasted tons of money, I just have to keep on taking the lessons and the test. But the longer I take the lessons and the tests, the more trapped I become.
This is very similar to what goes on when a JW finds that his religion challenged. On one level, he may appreciate the problem, but then there is the huge investment, both in time and in emotion. Nobody likes to admit to himself that all that effort could possibly be for nothing. If I have difficulty in calling it quits with a stupid driving test, the problem is a million times worse for a JW who has spent many years in the organisation.
Therefore, what you said about your family, does not surprise me at all. First, in their eyes you are a bit of an outsider, not to be fully trusted. Then, each JW member in your family will support the other. “Investment” looms in large writing on the wall, and somehow that makes it difficult to access an argument, never mind agreeing with it. “Where shall we go” is another problem: Many will believe they are in some kind or Noah’s ark, and accepting any critical comments in tantamount to jumping overboard, with nobody to pick them up from the water.
So perhaps, we are setting our aim too high: Those who are active and apparently content to be a JW cannot be reached? Or perhaps we need to pool experiences and expertise to discover ways to do this?
But what about those JW who venture here? Some do so just to wind people up, like “Jehovallah”, some get here by mistake. But some are driven here because they have already developed some doubts and questions, and it these people I think we should make welcome, and try our best to help. Slowly, patiently, bit by bit, we may be able to make a difference. In particular, we need to have an answer for “where shall we go?”: This will be an individual choice and different in every case, but we need to make these choices explicit and acceptable.
Ok, talk to you soon!
Mark
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 4:18 pm

Comment by Anonymous (Comment ID: 179794)
Hey Mark,
There are a few of us on this site who are ex JW, some for many years, most of us have family still encumbered in this faith, I am ok with this. Most of us are doomed in our loved ones eyes, I am ok with this.
Most write us off as non-entities, and do not even bother to return an invitation or call, here is where I fed up.
I was relatively well known in JW circles but became very infamous very soon after I chose to leave them.
Trying to reason with them is in my experience impossible. One would think, and the key word here is ‘think’ that they would no longer cling onto this faith with such integrity after so many false prophecies and ridiculous teachings. My favourite quote in this regard is: Deuteronomy 18: 20-22. It seems the more pressure they are put to face the more determined they become.
In my opinion one is entitled to believe what they choose, however nonsensical it my appear to others ie. me. I say this only when their belief does not migrate on the borders and beyond of hurting and in some instances killing others.
Before frequent readers of my comments start “Yea Markus you hypocrite, why do you attack us Christians”.
I will add: I hate someone trying to shove their own particular viewpoints down my throat, and in my defence all I did was show them proof from their own arsenal. It is a sore point when rockets fired at a target do 180 a degree turnabout and blow up the attacker.
Cheers,
Markus
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 8:52 pm

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 179833)
Hello Markus,
I am learning about this, quite rapidly, I think. The problem is what you pointed out yourself:
Their belief DOES migrate the borders and DOES hurt others. Other than that, it would not concern me at all what they believe or do.
I agree with you completely that it is quite senseless to try discussions with really committed JWs. They usually end up in a bible hop-scotch of one form or another, and go nowhere. I have been there, done that, bought the T-shirt, as they say. I even tried the proper, theological approach, and asked first why and to what extent is bible God’s word, but that got me nowhere either; would you believe it, essentially the answer I got the bible is God’s word because it says so in the bible. By the same logic I must be the Queen of Sheba, as long as I say so.
I do, not, at least not yet, share your pessimism, though: perhaps we just have not found the right tack yet. And this would be something I really would like to discover: how to make some in-roads into creating an independent mind.
Surely there must be some JW, who like you at a younger age, are beginning to question things and look for real answers. How to reach those and help them, that would be both achievable and worthwhile to know and do.
So, perhaps, when any of them stray here, can we spend a moment to find out why they have come this far? Perhaps we can be of some use to them, but we never find out if we shoot first and ask questions later.
Even if there is a silly post, if it is their first or even second one, perhaps we can at least sow the seeds for a more open mind, if we try to be a bit patient.
If we succeed in just ONE case in one year, how many others will benefit from that. Surely that must be worth a try.
I find this very frustrating, there I am with my Theology degree, for all it’s worth, and I cannot even handle or touch this problem. I have very liitle diffuculty in finding and explaining the problems in their doctrine, but no idea at all on how to get this accross to them. Whenever I try to talk to a JW, they usually get flustered after a while, and they never come back a second time. (I think we have something in common there…)
Perhaps I should try the mischieveous approach and enrol into a bible study, so that they cannot run away?
I thought of that, but it’s dishonest.
Mark
Posted on February 23, 2007 at 9:52 pm

Comment by Markus (Comment ID: 179934)
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the answer, I was just about to pack it in for the night, but must put across my agreement now.
I have committed myself to an enterprise which does not allow me as much time as I was previously privileged on this site.
The JW doctrine actually is a very good one, and because of this has the uncanny ability to ensnare good folk despite failed prophesies, or stupid doctrines like refraining from cooking in aluminium, or not taking life saving inoculations. The blood issue incredibly still rages today, and if it not for this I reckon
there would be a lot more pesky knocks on your door.
Once the door knocker gets past the usual householder’s
defences they ask intriguing questions like:
Do you think you were supposed to die? If you believe in the Bible and most of us in the western world do, why do you think Adam and Eve died? In a short while they will have you believing that our good grandparents should never have died but should still be living in paradise. It all makes good sense. If you formally believed in heaven or hell, actually it’s good news, cause you could be Jack the Ripper and still never get to hell.
As Bible quoter’s to reinforce their viewpoints there are few better at the game.
As for trying to convert a JW to conventional Christianity the success rate is very low, I have seen it though. usually when a very stressful condition arises, a divorce, or an unexpected death occurs out of the blue.
The witness are mostly good people, and have a reputation of leaving stadiums cleaner than it was found in the event of assemblies and other conventions. The average speaker at the local Kingdom Hall will tell you JW’s are favourably employed because of their reputable honesty, but this is mostly propaganda. There is a lot of that flowing, a favourite is Joey Kaputnik who left the Kingdom Hall after disassociating himself and was crushed in his car by a train. ‘Let us pray for his wife and children….. and now to finish the meeting lets sing song no 2001 Jehovah the merciful”.
I saw a lot of seriously shit things when I was a medic
in the army, I was equally dismayed when my previous regiment was disbanded after being told we were fighting for the wrong cause and should have in fact joined the enemy. Do a Google on 32 battalion, and no as a medic I did not have to speak Portugese, you might see why I joined the JW as a pacifist, as it was the only religion that made sense to a shell shocked 21 year old, who wanted to see his fallen comrades again.
Religion is a fiend that preys on all good people, telling nothing but lies and has NO problem collecting hard earned money from good folk NO matter how cash strapped they are.
I would like to remind all Bible thumpers out there that these views are my own, and if I make it to hell, as George Bernard Shaw says at least I got there honourably.
Good night good buddy.
Cheers,
Markus
Posted on February 24, 2007 at 12:23 am

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 180139)
Hello Markus,
you views are very different from mine, but I have no problem with that at all, nore have I any desire to justify myself to you or question you about your views. Let’s leave that to one side, and try to work together as two rational people trying to solve a problem.
The big difference between you and a JW is that you will not try to force others around to follow your views, and you are not doing any harm to anybody.
Most people discuss doctrines and scriptures really only for one purpose: to try to gain control over others or to make themselves feel superior because they have “shown” they have the “truth”, while the others do not. A brownie-point for “witnessing”…
To me, this is childish. If someone asks me about my beliefs, of course I tell them, but I don’t really care if they agree with me on these things or not. In the normal course of events, I keep such things to myself.
Now, to the point:
You may have seen the the extract of that academic article I posted: JW belong to “stage 2″ of spiritual development, whereas you, for example, belong to stage 3.
I disagree with classing stage 4 as somehow higher than stage 3 in the article: Both 3 and 4 are the next big step along from stage 2, as the author himself says, so perhaps he should have called it 3A (more or less your stage) and 3B (which describes me more or less, and also, I think, James Non-JW, but I am not sure); i.e. stage 3 and 4 are on the same level, because both are the next step from stage 2, but on different platforms, or there is a fork in the staircase, if you like.
Have read through that extract, I think it’s very good, I think you will like it.
So, in a nutshell, the big problem is: how to move someone from stage 2 to either stage 3A or 3B? How to make people grow? How to set someone free from a perceived absolute need for an institution?
Perhaps it helps if you told me what did the trick for you? If we could get together a list of “trigger events”, from different people with past JW experience, perhaps we are getting closer at cracking this tough nut.
Let me clarify my question a bit more: I am not asking what made you finally decide to leave the JW; I wonder what it was that made you look and question in the first place, just BEFORE you made your decision.
Posted on February 24, 2007 at 10:35 am

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 180141)
Markus,
Just in case you can’t find the article I was going on about, here it is again:
THE STAGES OF SPIRITUAL GROWTH (extract)
By M. Scott Peck, M.D. (a psychologist and theologian)
STAGE I:
Chaotic, Antisocial. Frequently pretenders; they pretend they are loving and pious, covering up their lack of principles. Although they may pretend to be loving (and think of themselves that way), their relationships with their fellow human beings are all essentially manipulative and self-serving. They really don’t give a hoot about anyone else. I call the stage chaotic because these people are basically unprincipled. Being unprincipled, there is nothing that governs them except their own will. And since the will from moment to moment can go this way or that, there is a lack of integrity to their being. They often end up, therefore in jails or find themselves in another form of social difficulty. Some, however, may be quite disciplined in the services of expediency and their own ambition and so may rise in positions of considerable prestige and power, even to become presidents or influential preachers.
STAGE II:
Formal, Institutional, Fundamental. Beginning the work of submitting themselves to principle-the law, but they do not yet understand the spirit of the law, consequently they are legalistic, parochial, and dogmatic. They are threatened by anyone who thinks differently from them, as they have the “truth,” and so regard it as their responsibility to convert or save the other 90 or 99 percent of humanity who are not “true believers.” They are religious for clear cut answers, with the security of a big daddy God and organization, to escape their fear of living in the mystery of life, the mystery of uncertainty in the ever moving and expanding unknown. Instead they choose the formulations, the stagnation of prescribed methods and doctrines that spell out life and attempt to escape fear. Yet these theological reasonings simply cover over fear, hide fear and do not transcend it in spite of with acceptance in expanding movement. All those outside of Stage II are perceived to be as Stage I, as they do not understand Stage III and Stage IV. Those who do fall, reverting from Stage II to Stage I are called “backsliders.”
There is a Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, Benny Hinn, Pat Robertson, mentality (one-sided thinking - ignorance that produces hostility) in every religion, the one-sidedness, in every ideology. Christianity cannot be condemned as responsible for the fundamentalists who claim to represent such. One just has to look at Mother Teresa or Martin Luther King, Jr. to see the opposite of such thinking. You can find the Falwell in Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, Jainism, Mohammedism and of course Christianity. That is the narrow one-sided exclusiveness that limits insight to one set of rules and one objective truth, under the literal logic or rationialism, that fails to apprehend the unseen intuitive essence of existence and ignorantly labels outsiders as misled sinners, while surrounding themselves with interior neurotic and finite walls of security and certainty. All is safe in this illusion, but all is not just, nor fair, and does not transcend prejudice that surpasses tribal identity, an identity that must be scrapped in order to bring higher consciousness of planetary cultural peace and love based on principle with intuitive insight.
There is also a Bin Laden (evil intolerance) in every religious culture and teaching, in every social, political and cultural view. Islam cannot be condemned as responsible for the extreme fundamentalists who incorporate harm and war. One just has to look at the other side within Islam, to the Sufi of compassion and peace, that of Bawa Muhaiyaddeen or Hazrat Inayat Khan. Yet the evil of extreme fundamentalism resides in all facets of society, those who would kill and destroy, torture and humiliate, all in the name of their theological and ideological views. They are of course the extreme fundamentalists, yet all forms of fundamentalism, both moderate to extreme, Stage II mentality, fails integration with non-acceptance, that of one-dimensional perception. And yet, in each of these same cultures, although the minority, there exists communal and mystical persons, Stage IV persons, those transmitting inclusiveness and compassion, who transcend all divisiveness in oneness.
STAGE III: (I called it stage 3A)
Skeptic, Individual, questioner, including atheists, agnostics and those scientifically minded who demand a measurable, well researched and logical explanation. Although frequently “nonbelievers,” people in Stage III are generally more spiritually developed than many content to remain in Stage II. Although individualistic, they are not the least bit antisocial. To the contrary, they are often deeply involved in and committed to social causes. They make up their own minds about things and are no more likely to believe everything they read in the papers than to believe it is necessary for someone to acknowledge Jesus as Lord and Savior (as opposed to Buddha or Mao or Socrates) in order to be saved. They make loving, intensely dedicated parents. As skeptics they are often scientists, and as such they are again highly submitted to principle. Indeed, what we call the scientific method is a collection of conventions and procedures that have been designed to combat our extraordinary capacity to deceive ourselves in the interest of submission to something higher than our own immediate emotional or intellectual comfort–namely truth. Advanced Stage III men and women are active truth seekers.
Despite being scientifically minded, in many cases even atheists, they are on a higher spiritual level than Stage II, being a required stage of growth to enter into Stage IV. The churches age old dilemma: how to bring people from Stage II to Stage IV, without allowing them to enter Stage III.
STAGE IV: (I called it stage 3B)
Mystic, communal. Out of love and commitment to the whole, using their ability to transcend their backgrounds, culture and limitations with all others, reaching toward the notion of world community and the possibility of either transcending culture or — depending on which way you want to use the words — belonging to a planetary culture. They are religious, not looking for clear cut, proto type answers, but desiring to enter into the mystery of uncertainty, living in the unknown. The Christian mystic, as with all other mystics, Sufi and Zen alike, through contemplation, meditation, reflection and prayer, see the Christ, Gods indwelling Spirit or the Buddha nature, in all people, including all the Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, Jews and so forth, recognizing the connectedness of all humanity with God, never separating oneself from others with doctrine and scripture, recognizing that all scripture acts as fallible pointers of inspiration, unable to capture the essence of truth outside of both human perception and the linguistic straight jacket of language and articulation, that is, the words of fallible men who experienced the nature of God, that of their inner true self, and attempted to record their experience in human words, words constrained by the era of time they were written in that became compromised the moment they were penned and are further removed from objectivity when interpreted by us, fallible men and women who read them.
Posted on February 24, 2007 at 10:51 am

Comment by Markus (Comment ID: 180268)
Hi Mark,
Thanks for this message. This has to be the most straight forward and cut to the chase of exactly how I feel. Thanks for placing it, there are a hell of a lot of fundamentalists who think I am out to undermine their faith, and although this is partly true it is by no means why I have spent a lot of time placing comments on this site. Unlike the fundamentalist Christian who somehow somewhere has bumped into knowledge he cannot himself understand, but will defend it (almost admirably) with an incredible amount of non logic, quoting of absolutely non relevant scriptures, he will later reflect on the great performance he has put up and believing he has the power of God behind him sleeps very gently at night.
My personal and I must emphasise personal research has indicated a non biblical revelation. Humans on this planet have absolutely no concept of what happens to them after death, and neither do I, however for people to believe in a faith of zero evidence construed by people who shout out guidance by a God of very questionable morals to me is ridiculous.
All I do on this site, is try to help folk who in most cases do not want to be helped, I wish to save them both money and dissapointment. Sorry folks thats the way I am.
Yes the Mother Teresa’s of this world have done endless good, and so have many other people both religious and non.
When I see evidence of preachers having an orgasm
in his white sports car with a prostitute and know that the payment of the said prostitute came from funds from you and me I start throwing my toys.
Faith is a touchy subject, it is an illusion we see evidenced by the JW worker bee thinking he/she is doing God’s work, it is also evident in the aftermath of a happy clappy event so often found at a charismatic church.
I do not care what happens to homosexuals behind closed doors, I do not care what religions do within the walls of their church, do not bring it out to offend my family and I and we will get on just fine.
Cheers,
Markus
Posted on February 24, 2007 at 3:50 pm

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 180393)
Hello again Markus,
I am glad you liked that one.
So, if we can, for the moment, talk about “stage 1, 2 3A and 3B” then the whole thing gets a bit easier.
We are quite clear that a JW, as a rule, is at stage 2, the fundamentalist and institutional stage of spiritual development, and is also clear that both of us have left that stage behind us.
The question is the trigger point. What happened to you to get you to move on? The justification of the move is a different matter, and it happens after the event. The key is what kind of events move people from stage 2 to either 3A or 3B?
In my case I think it was not a single event but a sequence: As a kid I was quite an intolerant little git, a catholic boy who thought that all non-Catholics go to hell. Being quite full of myself, I thought I make a good priest, so after high school I joined a seminary. There were others there just like me, but also some intriguing characters that were different: quiet, listening, hardly ever speaking, always helpful, and never arguing with me about any garbage I churned out over the dinner table. God, if I think how obnoxious I was, I cringe…
Because I was quite clever, I was sent to an ordinary university for studies, and I soon discovered that my save little world was being turned upside down. There were classes in philosophy and a lot just did not fit in with my world view; then we had church history classes and I soon discovered that there were a right bunch of villains as popes at one time or another, as well as a hell of a lot of very crooked decisions. Then doctrine classes, instead of getting a nice clear cut version, we got arguments for this view and then for that, and were asked to balance them up, not what I expected at all. A lot of confusion ensued.
In short, I was force-fed with thinking material. In the end, my overall conclusion was that one church is as good as any other, all have some good points in that they could provide a focus, but in the end none of them, including my own, are “right” in every way. In fact, all religions have something to offer, but it requires real INDIVIDUAL effort to find that little piece of gold in all the clutter and all the rubbish surrounding it. I was also quite clear that all organised religion was dangerous, at it often leads to unreasonable control over people, with frequently disastrous consequences.
So went to get ordained thinking this old crate (the Catholic Church) is about a good or as bad as the next, and if I have to work in one of them, I better pick the one I know best. Not an ideal starting point for a priest, I grant you, but I simply could not see what on earth I could do with my degree if I don’t follow it through.
However, I had one stroke of luck: in my first parish people complained I was too “liberal” in my preaching, and I was upsetting the older parishioners, so the bishop wisely sent me back to university to start an academic career.
So, now I teach ancient Hebrew and classical Greek, and don’t have to preach in public anymore, great. I also operate as a Chaplin for students, and I use this opportunity to get them thinking about religious matters and work things out for themselves.
So, now I am an unimportant, “semi-detached” cleric, without office as such, one that fits into a little corner to teach certain things, but otherwise does not have to tow the “party line”; to me, perfect: I don’t even have to bother the church for money, I get a teaching salary.
So, I have told you my “trigger point” for loosing trust in fundamentalist views and institutions: A requirement to study seriously and contact with good academics.
I would be interested what first cause you to think about getting out of the JW.
Posted on February 24, 2007 at 9:16 pm

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 180432)
Hello once more Markus,
there seem to be several Marks around, the post about armageddon was someone else.
Any good idea for a name for me for posting purposes to avoid confusion?
Thanks
Posted on February 24, 2007 at 10:50 pm

Comment by Markus (Comment ID: 180929)
Hi Mark,
I took to addressing the other Mark as Mark UK.
To answer you question: I left the JW’s mainly because I am a lazy person. I was tired of attending countless meetings after a tiresome day and was not receiving any upliftment spiritually. I had a lot of time on my hands all of a sudden and took to reading the scriptures, which I thought I knew so well.
So in answer to your question: I read the Old Testament, and for the first time I REALLY understood. Fact is we are grovelling to a God who is nothing more than a cold blooded psychopath. -End of story.
What I find truly incredible is how the fundamentilist
will dream up any excuse, or invent any story which will protect the deity of which he/she is so hooked.
When I look back and think of the endless hours at meetings, and generally pissing people off by knocking on a lot of doors, I almost feel a part of my life was stolen.
I am a dedicated family man, I earn an honest wage, I take time to do what I enjoy, mainly fishing and golf but at the same time ensure a comfortable home for my family, and if I have erred in the eyes of God, tough shit.
The heartbreaking part is that most Bible thumpers
do not even take the time to read the whole of their good book and are clueless to all sections that do not reinforce their own viewpoints.
Turns out Jesus is not much better than Joe Hover and in fact points out to us we should never disregard the good teachings in the Old Testament.
So the message to all Christians out there is: Stop praying for me and you read your very own good book cover to cover before you come to me insisting Jesus died for me and loves me, because nothing can be further from the truth.
Cheers,
Markus
Posted on February 25, 2007 at 6:03 pm

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 180948)
Ok, this is most interesting. So, because not much was happening in term of spirituality, you started off on your own, and that is how you got where you are today.
So, how to get people to start off on their own?
That is the million dollar question.
You see, for me the bible is not at all the same thing as for a JW. If you imagine God to be room full of bright light, the bible is a tiny beam of light that escapes through the keyhole, with dust dancing in it.
The minute anyone tries to commit a religious experience to paper, it becomes just a shodow of what is once was. This applies to all biblical writers. They all try to put into words what essentially cannot be expressed. If we then add to that problem that they wrote is languages very different from ours, so that translations are always faulty, and they wrote so long ago, that all of their words may as well be from a different world, we are beginning to understand the problem. That does not mean the old book is useless, but it certainly is not the authoritative manual to all things relating to God. Things just are not that simple.
Someone once said if you want to know what a rose is, you need to look at one and smell it, not to cut one up and look at it under the microscope. Perhaps it is the same with religion. God cannot simply be found in any book, first people need to find him inside ourselves. We don’t even absolutely need that book to really find God, a site like this where people talk about things is just as good, maybe better. At least we can ask each other, a luxory we do not have with bible authors.
You often mention hell: Well, hell is like this:
Imagine a room full of people. In the middle there is a large dish of food. Each person has a one meter long spoon which they must gasp at the end, to get food. They keep trying but nobody manages to get any food to their lips. Heaven is an identical room, with one difference: people simply feed each other. We make our own heaven and hell.
Sorry, preaching again, old habits…
Thanks for telling me, we are getting somewhere. I wonder if I can get James-NonJW, fri and the rest tell us also?
Have a nice day
Mark (the padre, not the UK Mark)
Posted on February 25, 2007 at 6:44 pm

Comment by Markus (Comment ID: 181045)
Hi Mark,
A slither of light emerging from a hey hole will never find me, as far as spirituality is concerned. Read what Albert Einstein thought about spirituality, now there is an idiot for you.
Thanks for the rose analogy, it looks beautiful, smells lovely, and works wonders on my wife, why scrutinize it? I may look at something if it is not good but if it ain’t broke why try fix it, as the saying goes.
Here is an excerpt from a comment I placed a long time ago, I forget where I found it and although it is somewhat humorous, it reflects many a true homage as to how religion has been conducted since time began, and still is, and the monkeys conducting it today still do not have even a clue:
Take a group of monkeys and place them in a room or large cage, place a ladder in the middle of the cage, leading to some lovely fruit hanging within reach just above the ladder. When a monkey climbs the ladder and attempts to reach the fruit, A high powered hose is blasted against all the monkeys. It takes a while, but eventually the monkeys learn to leave the prize alone. When a monkey starts to go up the ladder, he gets battered by his mates, as they don’t want to get punished by this monkey’s doing.
Introduce a new monkey into the cage and it will soon go for the fruit but stops, once he gets the shit kicked out of him by his piers.
Introduce another monkey into the arena and the same thing happens, only this time with the last primate that got wacked, joining in vigorously.
Over time disassociate all the original animals so that only the ones WITHOUT knowledge of the dreaded hose remain.
We now have a cage full of animals that do not know why they cannot climb the ladder, but dare not.
After a couple of years of us being born, we get ingrained into our heads how God is watching over us, and 99.9% of us accept it without question.
We go our various ways each believing our religion is right and all others are mistaken. We never get to question the validity of an actual God but we will go to war to preserve our own doctrine.
By the way Mark, please do not give me well meaning instructions on how to find heaven, to me there is no such thing, and the closest one gets is in the happiness
one finds in one’s own heart.
Cheers,
Markus
Posted on February 25, 2007 at 9:34 pm

Comment by Mark (Comment ID: 181088)
Hello again.
God the policeman is really not my idea of God either. Nor is the God of dogma and factions.
I think we both have moved on from that, but in different directions.
Let’s leave all that on one side, and see what else we can find out. We are both quite clear that JW are stuck in a stage of thinking of God as a policeman and fixated in dogmatic squabbles with everybody else. We both know that this is a waste of a life, and can even be dangerous, and yet neither of us have quite worked out how to get some movement into this mindset.
We have established so far that a degree of dissatisfaction, even if only vague, may sometimes trigger movement. Perhaps it starts with a general notion that there must be more to it than humdrum bible studies, or some genuine doubts that the doctrinal stuctures on offer are not right. There surely are other such trigger events, but we don’t know what they are yet. Possibly events in personal lives?
A JW in that state of mind of even vague doubts or dissatisfaction it ready for some help, because he will have recovered his ability to listen. In your experience, have you had contacts with other ex-JW? What did they say about what got them to reach a decision to leave? Was is always similar to your own experience, or sometimes different?
Also, did most such others always follow you in your perspective on religious issues, or did some go into a different direction? The guy who set up “freeminds”, tells a similar story to you, but he went a different way.
In particular, do most ex-JW move to stage 3A, like you, or do they mainly move sideways to a different group, replacing one nice secure mindset with another? Did any move to the 3B stage?
Sorry, lots of questions. When I become a nuisance, tell me, and I stop asking you. It’s just you are the best person I know who can tell me.
Take care
Mark
Posted on February 25, 2007 at 10:51 pm

Comment by Dianne (Comment ID: 30368)
Wow Rado,
What a picture! Is it one of your own? I’ve read your story…
I am very interested in exploring art as a form of expression myself and am only just starting to get things down on paper. Well, the back of old envelopes actually.
Dianne
Posted on July 28, 2006 at 4:15 pm
You are now able to reply on each individual post with the new Nested Comments-functionality. This functionality will help to make the discussions more natural. You can collapse or unfold a threads by clicking on the collapse/unfold-buttons. If you click on “comments” you will see an example.

