Jehovah’s Witness pedophile walked free from court despite one of his victims was a baby

September 5th, 2007 | Posted in: , (Sexual) Child Abuse | Keywords: , , , | 271 Comments



Jehovah\'s Witness pedophile Michael PorterA Jehovah’s Witness pedophile was spared prison despite admitting carrying out a string of sex attacks on young children.

Michael Porter, 38, used his trusted position as a ministerial servant to indulge his habits as a pedophile. One of his victims was an 18-month-old baby.

Jehovah’s Witness parents trusted him to look after their children, and Porter regularly babysat for youngsters, took them away on holidays and invited them for sleepovers at his home.

Michael Porter pleaded guilty to 24 counts of indecent assault and gross indecency on children at Bristol Crown Court.

He walked free from court on August 23 (2007) despite admitting his sexual abuse of young children. Judge Thomas Crowther handed him a three-year community rehabilitation order after hearing he had undergone therapy.

Judge Thomas Crowther said:

“This is a case which in my experience is exceptional, in a sense historic and revealed by you in unusual circumstances which I am sure are linked with the faith by which you now run your life. ..

I’m satisfied, having the advantage of a number of reports as to your early background, that the reasons for your behaving as you did are complex and personal and reveal that you were subject to pressures which make it understandable that you should have acted as you did in this case. ..

What’s important, in terms of sentence, to realize is that you had changed your life before there was any question of these matters being revealed and I’m as satisfied as I can be, whereas in some circumstances punishment by way of imprisonment is inevitable, this is not one of those, and the proper sentence is a community rehabilitation order.”

However, Porter’s sister Tina Hughes spoke out against the ruling and warned that her brother would commit further offences now he was back in society:

“I think the judge was absolutely pathetic. He just took my brother’s side completely and believed that all he needed was a bit more therapy and now realized he had done wrong. …

He blamed his childhood for the attacks, which was a lie, but the judge ate it all up. …
I just broke down in tears when the judge said he wasn’t going to jail. The whole courtroom went quiet. No-one could believe it. …
I can’t believe the judge thinks he is safe to be allowed out on the streets. He won’t stop. …

He has gone back to London and left us to pick up the pieces. He hasn’t lost anything. He hasn’t even lost his wife. He hasn’t been affected in any way. He can go away and pretend nothing has happened because he doesn’t have to live here.”

A source said:

“One of the problems was that most of the victims were not prepared to make statements or give any kind of evidence. The offenses took place a long time ago and most of them seemed keen to put it all behind them.”

Mr Porter’s current Jehovah’s Witness congregation has stood by him despite confessing to his crimes, according to his sister. He is thought to be an elder at the Mill Hill Kingdom Hall, in Barnet, north London. Mill Hill is one of the most significant congregations in United Kingdom, as it is the official home congregation for the Branch Office of the IBSA (International Bible Students Association). Porter is listed as a “Trustee” for the Mill Hill Congregation with the UK Charities Commission.

Jehovah’s Witness elders from Porter’s Mill Hill Congregation assured media that Porter would be “supervised” as he attended meetings and door to door ministry to offer bibles studies with families.

Update: On 19 September 2007 the BBC reported that Porter’s case is to be reviewed by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The Court of Appeal will now review the case to decide whether to increase Porter’s sentence.

A statement from the Attorney General’s office said:

“After a careful review, the Attorney General Baroness Scotland has decided to refer the sentence. She considers the sentence to be unduly lenient.

It will now be for the Court of Appeal to decide at a future hearing whether or not to increase the sentence.”



271 Comments

Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » (Show All)


Comment by Brenda (Comment ID: 314362)

The Judge his comments and his way of closing the case can oviously be discussed. I m not saying I do agree with im, I m only saying that he is the right person in that case to judge and he would have only made such an decision if he trully stands behind his believes.

the guy s picture is kinda scary :)



Posted on May 7, 2008 at 12:15 am

 

Comment by otto marconi (Comment ID: 312875)

to rosalba ibrahim,

dear, one of the things that at the beginning started troubling about my membership with the Towers of All Terrors (as an exploited grunt unfortunately, not as one of the cunning exploiters) was the fact that the congros are populated with types like you. I couldn’t stand your kind. I wanted you out because types like you I thought were a disgrace for our great jehowhore organization.
But now I only wish you remained a jehovordure, so that you can enjoy the truth of the Towers of All Terrors.
Do you think I’m crazy?



Posted on April 30, 2008 at 7:14 am

 

Comment by rosalba ibrahim (Comment ID: 305300)

you are evil people! apostate! God judment is over you! you sons of Satan. liers! JW do not sale in the doors anything! your father is satan the manslayer lier!
you are his seed! LIERS!



Posted on February 16, 2008 at 5:22 am


Comment by James NON-JW (Comment ID: 305450)

This is a typical emotional response from a JW, devoid of any facts to support another train of thought or argument.
Your comment merely reinforces many people’s perception of your group, an uneducated motley crew with only the ability to quote or robotically parrot mindless garbage from the Watchtower.
Please open your eyes.



Posted on February 16, 2008 at 8:56 pm


Comment by Serious Derious Bagfelt (Comment ID: 314075)

How can you refer to someone as uneducated when you write “people’s” perception when it is obviously peoples’ perception? Please edit your sentences.



Posted on May 5, 2008 at 7:18 pm

 
 
 

Comment by Anonymous (Comment ID: 304286)

As I see it, it is possible that the judge in this particular case (as with so many others we have seen) is most likely of the same persuation as the said victim. These creeps will protect and defend each other in order to keep the peace among themselves, at the unfortunate expense of the rest of society.



Posted on February 11, 2008 at 5:17 pm


Comment by Anonymous (Comment ID: 304337)

Oops!! I meant PREDATOR, not VICTIM. The judge might be one also…



Posted on February 12, 2008 at 1:03 am

 
 

Comment by Mary Jenkins (Comment ID: 300113)

What’s the situation with child abuse?

Not good. They (Jehovah’s Witnesses) take Deuteronomy 19:15 literally, which demands two witnesses to a crime (not easy in cases of abuse). And they cite 1 Corinthians 6:1-11 – “Does anyone of you that has a case against the other dare to go to court before unrighteous men, and not before the holy ones?” – to justify trying to deal with criminals with courts of elders rather than courts of law.

A Panorama (British) investigation reported they have an internal list of 23,720 reported abusers which they keep private.

Studies in the US suggest they (Jehovah’s Witnesses) have proportionally FOUR times more sexual assaults on children than the Catholic Church.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/features/article3133271.ece
from here

(What is disturbing is that these predators are required to go door to door in the Jehovah’s Witnesses



Posted on January 27, 2008 at 7:28 pm


Comment by otto marconi (Comment ID: 300120)

to Mary Jenkins,

obviously this horror reflect the abysmal corruption of our society in general, including -I’m sorry to say for my beloved country- chunks of the government. They know this state of things yet don’t shut them down. Terrorists should be prosecuted in no time. Yet the Towers of All Terrors enjoy some -albeit shameful- status even in the US.
In the name of what? in the name of a remote-controlled “freedom” of religion.
And after all it’s not jehovordures’ fault if the monsters who wrote the bible managed to somehow raise the status of this forerunner of Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ to holy book status.
The only difference is that the bible -despite being used and recycled ad infinitum toiled paper- is the world more dangerous and blasphemous than all Mein kampfs in the world.
Please di visit the site ‘SET FREE FROM JESUS’ to ascertain for yourself.
There will be no doubt about this after having done this -which is also a duty for all those who work for a better society.



Posted on January 27, 2008 at 7:57 pm

 
 

Comment by otto marconi (Comment ID: 299966)

shame on you jehovordures for all this paedophile filth within your underworld.



Posted on January 26, 2008 at 11:54 pm

 

Comment by Rubens (Comment ID: 296821)

Is this a site devoted to JW ? as you say here or devoted to attack JW ? /fishing bad accounts is obviously one of your main objectives here.It is a shame.You are like the devil.Opposers of this people.They are good people and I am not one of JW but I feel a kind of hate here and a lot of bad motivation.Jw real web site is very different !



Posted on January 15, 2008 at 3:35 am


Comment by Anonymous (Comment ID: 296954)

Hey Jack (rubens)if you dont feel the love on this site try watchtower.org - Just close your eys park your brain in slow mode and you will fit right in. You idiot



Posted on January 15, 2008 at 2:15 pm


Comment by otto marconi (Comment ID: 297108)

dear rubens,
thank you for your comment.
But if you know the answer, why the hell do ask?
I also thank you cos your post made me laugh my ass off for a couple of minutes, you may not know but I enjoy laugh therapy.
Though you deny it (what a shame!) you are more of a jehov-ordure than you think.
ya BS nobody here
ah! ah! ah! ah! ah! ah! ah! ah! ah! ah! ah!



Posted on January 16, 2008 at 1:10 am

 
 

Comment by vern (Comment ID: 303948)

Having never been a witness it is ovious you are totally unqualified to make the comment you have made. As an ex jw Iurge you to research there dismal record and reavualate you statement based on the results.



Posted on February 9, 2008 at 2:12 pm

 
 

Comment by Debra (Comment ID: 295647)

My ex husband, an elder, tipped his brother in law off that they were doing an investigational phone call between his daughter and the pedifile uncle. The marriage desolved, the pedifile brother in law was made a ministerail servant. I lost my mother.My ex husband left me in a hospital for depression. we devoirced, he remained a Jw, he later married a filipino girl 5 years older than our oldest son , has created me and numereous JWS out of realestate,has named me as a person who will pay his income tax thus frauding the IRS… AND HE IS STILL AN ELDER.



Posted on January 10, 2008 at 11:56 pm


Comment by otto marconi (Comment ID: 295995)

sorry for your nightmare…what can I say….uhmm…wave of the future?



Posted on January 12, 2008 at 1:04 am

 
 

Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » (Show All)

Leave a comment

Don't forget to fill in the following Anti-Spam-Word* before you press the submit-button:

*This action is intended to prove that you are a human being and not some kind of robot spamming this site with advertisements.

Click here for a list of Recent Comments on other Articles