<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses: Watchtower Information Service &#187; Dates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/category/dates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>2004: Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses still on the watch for the end of this world</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/2004-jehovahs-witnesses-still-on-the-watch-for-the-end-of-this-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/2004-jehovahs-witnesses-still-on-the-watch-for-the-end-of-this-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 21th century is already the third century in which Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses expect the end of this world. Every year the Watchtower Society publishes a Yearbook with a Yeartext. The Yeartext for 2004 is:
“Keep on the Watch&#8230; Prove Yourselves Ready.&#8221; – Matthew 24:42,44
This Yeartext is accompanied with the following remarks:
“Consistently, God&#8217;s Word reminds us that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='/wp-images/2004.gif' class="alignleft"/>The 21th century is already the third century in which Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses expect the end of this world. Every year the Watchtower Society publishes a Yearbook with a Yeartext. The Yeartext for 2004 is:<span id="more-32"></span></p>
<p>“Keep on the Watch&#8230; Prove Yourselves Ready.&#8221; – Matthew 24:42,44</p>
<p>This Yeartext is accompanied with the following remarks:</p>
<p>“Consistently, God&#8217;s Word reminds us that Jehovah&#8217;s day will arrive with shocking suddenness. Hence, our yeartext for 2004 reflects Jesus&#8217; deep love for his disciples, whom he wants to preserve through &#8220;the great tribulation.&#8221; (Rev. 7:14 ) How do we remain spiritually watchful and ready? By allowing nothing to distract us from our study of God&#8217;s Word and from our privileges of sacred service.”</p>
<p>Six succeeding generations of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses have expected that the day of Jehovah will arrive with ‘shocking suddenness&#8217;. Again and again the Witnesses are pressed to remain ‘watchful and ready&#8217;. Here are some quotes from 19the century Watchtower publications:</p>
<p>“In the coming 26 years, all present governments will be overthrown and dissolved.” (1889 – Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. II)</p>
<p>“And, with the end of A.D. 1914, what God calls Babylon , and what men call Christendom, will have passed away, as is already shown from prophecy.” (1897 – Studies In The Scriptures, Vol. III)</p>
<p>But all the governments were not dissolved in 1914 and Christendom was still alive. After the miscalculation of 1914 the Witnesses thought that 1915 would bring the end of this world:</p>
<p>“The Gentile Times prove that the present governments must all be overthrown about the close of A.D. 1915; and Parallelism above shows that this period corresponds exactly with the year A.D. 70, which witnessed the completion of the downfall of the Jewish polity.” (1915 Edition – The Time Is At Hand)</p>
<p>It is a little tedious to enumerate all Watchtower quotations concerning the upcoming end that appeared in magazines and books after 1914. The destruction of governments and/or Christendom was predicted for the following years:</p>
<p>•1918 End of Gentile times, Christendom to be destroyed.</p>
<p>•1920 “ Every kingdom of earth will pass away, be swallowed up in anarchy” .</p>
<p>•1925 Faithful men of the Old Testament were to return and the establishment of the Kingdom in Palastine .</p>
<p>•1932 Christendom to be overthrown.</p>
<p>•1975 Armageddon.</p>
<p>•&lt;2000 Armageddon before the turn of the century</p>
<p>Because the great motivator behind the proselyting activity of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses is the ‘upcoming end&#8217;, the Watchtower Society will continue to stimulate its followers with Yeartexts, articles and public talks. Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses believe that the only chance for salvation is to actively preach the end of this world and the Kingdom of God . If they are not busy with their ‘sacred service&#8217; when the ‘day of Jehovah&#8217; will arrive with ‘shocking suddenness&#8217; they believe that they will die with the wicked ones.</p>
<p>“Keep on the Watch&#8230; Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses will predict the end of this world till the end of this world&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>BY RADO VLEUGEL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/2004-jehovahs-witnesses-still-on-the-watch-for-the-end-of-this-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>188</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Watchtower Society Backpedals on Earthquakes</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/the-watchtower-society-backpedals-on-earthquakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/the-watchtower-society-backpedals-on-earthquakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2003 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jehovah’s Witnesses have long claimed that earthquakes have been far more frequent and severe in the 20th century than previously, and have caused far more deaths and damage. An examination.
or How Magicians Write Essays


  Alan Feuerbacher
  
Along with many other features of what it calls “the composite sign of Christ’s presence since 1914,” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--show=nonsingle-->Jehovah’s Witnesses have long claimed that earthquakes have been far more frequent and severe in the 20th century than previously, and have caused far more deaths and damage. An examination.<!--/show--><span id="more-161"></span>
<div align="center"><b>or How Magicians Write Essays</b></p>
</div>
<p align="center">
  <font size=2>Alan Feuerbacher<br />
  </font></p>
<p align="left"><font size=2><b>Along with many other features of what it calls “the composite sign of Christ’s presence since 1914,” the Watchtower Society has long claimed that earthquakes have been far more frequent and severe in the 20th century than previously, and have caused far more deaths and damage. The December 1, 1993 Watchtower virtually abandons these claims, but does so in a manner calculated not to let on to the average Jehovah’s Witness that the earlier claims have indeed been abandoned. We will here examine the earlier claims and see how the Society neatly reduces them to almost no significance without letting on that it has done it. The Watchtower article is a fine example from the Society’s arsenal of intellectual magic tricks and illustrates how to divert the reader’s attention from the main issue.</b></font></p>
<p>
  First let us look at quotations showing that the Society has stated clearly that the number of earthquakes occurring each year has been much higher in the 20th century, especially since 1914.&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Since 1914 earthquakes have occurred more often than ever before. [<i>From Paradise Lost to Paradise Regained</i>, 1958, p. 183] </p>
<p>Jesus said there would also be “earthquakes in one place after another.” Therefore, for this to be the time of Jesus’ second presence earthquakes would have to be in evidence in an outstanding way. Are they? There can be no question about it. Terrifying earthquakes have rocked the globe with increasing severity and frequency during recent years. A university seismologist declared: “Something is going on all over the planet that is hard to put a finger on. Great forces are at work stirring up things far underground causing vast land drifts on several continents. The further you are from the last big earthquake, the nearer you are to the next.” Significantly, since 1914 there have been more major earthquakes than in any previous period of similar length in recorded history. [<i>Watchtower</i>, October 15, 1961, p. 628] </p>
<p>After 1914, particularly since 1948, great subterranean forces seem to have been at work, convulsing our planet, rippling its surface with tremors and almost annually producing one or more disastrous earthquakes. [<i>Watchtower</i>, November 15, 1964, p. 678] </p>
<p>Earthquakes continue to rock the earth as Jesus forecast for this generation&#8230;. It has been reported that the severity and deadliness of earthquakes have increased markedly since the “time of the end” commenced for this old system in 1914. [<i>Watchtower</i>, May 1, 1970, p. 270] </p>
<p>Jesus foretold earthquakes in great number and magnitude as a feature of the sign of his second presence&#8230;. Since 1914 C.E., and especially since 1948, there has been an increase in the number of earthquakes, especially of major ones. [<i>Aid to Bible Understanding</i>, 1971, p. 478] </p>
<p>Jesus did not foretell any one specific earthquake, but he did prophesy about a period of time when there would be particularly great and widespread earthquake activity&#8230;. The “great earthquakes,” those occurring since 1914 in “one place after another,” verify the accuracy of this understanding of Jesus’ words&#8230;. The great earthquakes of the past were generally isolated events occurring years, even centuries, apart. There were not many of them in a single generation. [<i>Awake!</i>, May 8, 1974, pp. 17-18] </p>
<p>Commissioner Gregorio Andal of the Commission on Volcanology said: “The earth’s crust at this point is in a turbulent condition and earthquakes can happen anywhere in the world, anytime.” Another group of scientists believes that some seismic process, not fully understood at this time, may be taking place. [<i>Awake!</i>, January 8, 1977, pp. 15-6] </p>
<p>The dramatic upsurge in earthquake activity since 1914 helps to prove that we are living in the time of Jesus’ presence. These mighty temblors fulfill his prophecy: “There will be great earthquakes.” [<i>Awake!</i>, February 22, 1977, p. 11] </p>
<p>Truly, earthquakes have abounded since 1914 — as part of the “sign.” [<i>Watchtower</i>, January 15, 1978, p. 10] </p>
<p>Discussing recent earthquakes, the Italian journal <i>Il Piccolo</i> observed: “Our generation lives in a dangerous period of high seismic activity, as statistics show&#8230;.” Of course, such an increase in seismic activity is no surprise to those familiar with Bible prophecy. [<i>Watchtower</i>, June 15, 1979, p. 11] </p>
<p>Has the frequency of earthquakes really increased? The Italian magazine <i>Il Piccolo</i> observed: “Our generation lives in a dangerous period of high seismic activity, as statistics show.” And then it produced figures for the past thousand years to prove it. [<i>Awake!</i>, October 8, 1980, p. 21] </p>
<p>Also, “earthquakes” are included as part of the “sign.” An upsurge in earthquakes since 1914? This may sound surprising. But the statistics are even more surprising! As Geo Malagoli commented in <i>Il Piccolo</i>: “During a period of 1,059 years [from 856 to 1914] reliable sources list only 24 major earthquakes.” His figures show that during those years an average of 1,800 persons died each year in earthquakes, whereas there have been 43 major earthquakes since 1915, and these have killed an average of 25,300 persons a year. [<i>Let Your Kingdom Come</i>, 1981, p. 113] </p>
<p>From 1914 until now, there have been many more major earthquakes than in any other like period in recorded history. [<i>Watchtower</i>, April 15, 1982, p. 9] </p>
<p>Jesus foretold “great earthquakes.” (Luke 21:11) Has the frequency of these really changed?&#8230; Since 1914 the yearly average of reported severe earthquakes has soared to over 11 times what it was during the thousand years before then. [<i>Awake!</i>, October 22, 1984, pp. 6-7] </p>
<p>The frequency of major earthquakes has increased about <i>20 times</i> what it was on an average during the two thousand years before 1914. [<i>Survival into a New Earth</i>, 1984, p. 23] </p>
<p>In comparison with the previous 2,000 years, the average per year has been 20 times as great since 1914. [<i>Reasoning from the Scriptures</i>, 1985, p. 236] </p>
<p>Based on available records, the 20th century does significantly overshadow the past in seismic activity. Publications of the Watch Tower Society have repeatedly called attention to this. [<i>Watchtower</i>, January 15, 1987, p. 21] </p>
<p>With adequate preparation, many people have survived major disasters. Michiko, now 76 years old, says: “When I was a child, old people said major earthquakes came once in 60 years. I have often thought that their words have not applied in my lifetime. I have known countless severe earthquakes.” [<i>Awake!</i>, December 22, 1987, p. 27] </p>
<p>Jesus foretold earthquakes in significant number and intensity as a feature of the sign of his presence&#8230; Since 1914 C.E., there has been an increase in the number of earthquakes, resulting in much distress. [<i>Insight on the Scriptures</i>, 1988, p. 670] </p>
<p>The 20th century has been a century of earthquakes. [<i>The Bible — God’s Word or Man’s?</i>, 1989, p. 141</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In 1987 Carl Olof Jonsson and Wolfgang Herbst published the book <i>The “Sign” of the Last Days — When?</i> It showed conclusively that earthquake frequency in the 20th century is pretty much the same as in other centuries. After that the Society began to tone down its claims about the severity of earthquakes.&nbsp; </p>
<p>For example, the above quoted January 15, 1987 <i>Watchtower</i>, on pages 21-2, acknowledged that&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>many seismologists believe that earthquakes are no greater or more frequent now than they were in the past. Conversely, others conclude that our generation has experienced earthquakes more frequently than did previous ones. Based on available records, the 20th century does significantly overshadow the past in seismic activity. Records of earthquakes before 1914 are not complete, however. And earlier generations did not have scientific means of measurement that would permit us reliably to compare the magnitudes of earthquakes past and present.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Then followed a discussion that tried to make “earthquake distress” the focal point of the supposed increase.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The October 15, 1988 <i>Watchtower</i>, on page 3, claimed that according to data listed in two books (the data was acknowledged to be incomplete), earthquakes have been much worse since 1914, but “even granting that records from past centuries are incomplete, we cannot escape the conclusion that in our time mankind has been greatly affected by earthquakes.” An April 8, 1988 <i>Awake!</i> article was very significant in that it made no mention at all that earthquakes are more severe than in earlier times. In fact, with respect to all the features of the “composite sign”:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Let us remember that while Jesus’ prophecy indicates a climax in man’s history as all these events come together <i>in the same generation</i>, they do not require that they be greater in number or magnitude than in any previous generation, even though that might be so. [p. 4]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>However, the April 1, 1991 <i>Watchtower</i> (p. 6) restated the earlier position:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>The different features of the composite sign foretold by Jesus have never before been fulfilled all together in such a short period of time with such intensity and with such far-reaching consequences.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The March 22, 1993 <i>Awake!</i> was again vague about the intensity of earthquakes, merely saying on page 8 that “their magnitude also adds weight.”&nbsp; </p>
<p>In addition to claiming that the frequency of earthquakes is much greater in the 20th century, the Watchtower Society has claimed that they are more destructive of life and property. The following quotations show this clearly.&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>As Jesus foretold, after 1914 a series of earthquakes rocked the globe, causing more damage and casualties than ever before&#8230;. Earthquakes have continued to occur with frightening intensity, taking a toll of lives greater than in any other period of human history. [<i>Did Man Get Here By Evolution Or By Creation?</i>, 1967, p. 164; <i>Watchtower</i>, April 1, 1967, p. 198] </p>
<p>What about the earthquakes? Has there been anything unusual about these in the generation since 1914? [Subtitle “Earthquakes Since the Year 1914”] One way to prove clearly that the generation since 1914 is unusual as far as earthquakes are concerned is to consider how many deaths they have caused. [Statistics are cited]&#8230;. In other words, up to 30 percent of all those killed in earthquakes over the last thousand-year period have died since 1914! The other 70 percent or so of the deaths were spread out over almost nine hundred and fifty years. [<i>Watchtower</i>, February 1, 1974, pp. 72-3]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Also on page 73 a sidebar is presented entitled “Earthquake Deaths Each Year,” containing the captions “Before 1914 — 3,000” and “Since 1914 — 15,000.”&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Well over 100,000 persons have died in great earthquakes just since 1968! Those injured, homeless or suffering property damage number in the millions. This represents a tremendous increase over what took place in past centuries. [<i>Watchtower</i>, April 15, 1974, p. 243] </p>
<p>What shows that Jesus’ words, “there will be great earthquakes,” have been fulfilled since 1914 C.E.? — Luke 21:11. The earthquakes since 1914 C.E. have been “great” in terms of power, lives lost and property damage. In fact, their destructiveness has been more widespread and greater than in the years prior to 1914 C.E., claiming approximately 30 percent of all persons killed in earthquakes during the last thousand-year period. [<i>Watchtower</i>, May 15, 1974, p. 318] </p>
<p>Counting from about 1,000 years ago, the average yearly death rate from earthquakes was 3,000 before 1914; but since then that average has leaped to 15,000 per year. [<i>Awake!</i>, January 8, 1977, p. 16]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The following paragraphs are from <i>Awake!</i>, February 22, 1977, p. 11.&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Interestingly, for a period of 1,059 years (856 to 1914 C.E.), reliable sources list only 24 major earthquakes, with 1,972,952 fatalities. But compare that with the accompanying <i>partial list</i> citing 43 instances of earthquakes, in which 1,579,209 persons died during just the 62 years from 1915 to 1976 C.E. Here, year by year, are the locations of some of the quakes of this period, along with statistics on the fatalities: </p>
<table cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 align=center border=1>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<th vAlign=top>
<p>1915-1983:&nbsp;</p>
</th>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Year&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Location&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>Deaths&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1915&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>29,970&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1920&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>180,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1923&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>143,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1927&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>200,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1932&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>70,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1933&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>U.S.A.&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>115&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1935&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India (Pakistan)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>60,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1939&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Chile&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>30,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1939&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>23,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1946&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,300&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1946&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1948&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,131&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1949&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Ecuador&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1950&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,500&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1953&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1953&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Greece&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>424&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1954&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Algeria&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,657&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1956&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Afghanistan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1957&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Northern)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,500&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1957&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Western)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1960&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Chile&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,700&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1960&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Morocco&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>12,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1962&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1963&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Yugoslavia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,100&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1964&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Alaska&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>131&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1966&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,529&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1969&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>11,588&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1970&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,086&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1970&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Peru&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>66,794&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1971&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>U.S.A.&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>65&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1972&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,057&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1972&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Nicaragua&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1973&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Mexico (Western)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>52&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1973&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Mexico (Central)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>700&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1974&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Pakistan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1975&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1975&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,312&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Guatemala&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>23,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>900&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Bali&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>600&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China *&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>242,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Philippines&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,373&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,790&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>1977-1983 addition +&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>44,623&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>Total 1915-1983:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,210,597&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>Annual average:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>17,545&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The dramatic upsurge in earthquake activity since 1914 helps to prove that we are living in the time of Jesus’ presence. These mighty temblors fulfill his prophecy: “There will be great earthquakes.” [<i>Awake!</i>, February 22, 1977, p. 11] </p>
<p>Discussing recent earthquakes, the Italian journal “Il Piccolo” observed: “Our generation lives in a dangerous period of high seismic activity, as statistics show. In fact, during a period of 1,059 years (from 856 to 1914) reliable sources list only 24 major earthquakes causing 1,973,000 deaths. However, if we compare this figure to the partially complete list of recent disasters, we find that 1,600,000 persons have died in only 63 years, as a result of 43 earthquakes which occurred from 1915 to 1978.” Of course, such an increase in seismic activity is no surprise to those familiar with Bible prophecy. [<i>Watchtower</i>, June 15, 1979, p. 11]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that <i>Il Piccolo</i> borrowed its figures without attribution from the above quoted February 22, 1977 <i>Awake!</i> The June 15, 1979 <i>Watchtower</i> borrowed in turn from <i>Il Piccolo</i> but did not inform the reader that <i>Il Piccolo</i> borrowed from the earlier <i>Awake!</i> So here the Society was quoting itself while pretending the data came from an independent source.&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>There have been earthquakes throughout history. But how does the period since World War I compare? In <i>Il Piccolo</i>, Geo Malagoli observes: [<i>Il Piccolo</i> is cited, and a sidebar is presented containing the statements “Up to 1914 — 1,800 a year” “Since 1914 — 25,300 a year”]&#8230;. Persons may say that the growing world population and the size of cities account for the higher earthquake death toll since World War I. Even if this is the reason, it does not change what has happened. [<i>Happiness — How to Find It</i>, 1980, pp. 148-9] </p>
<p>Very significantly, our century has seen more earthquake destruction than any other. From the time Jesus gave his prophecy until 1914, history records five earthquakes that each took 100,000 lives or more. In the period since 1914 at least <i>four more</i> such superearthquakes have occurred — in China in 1920, in Tokyo in 1923, in China in 1927, and, of course, the Tangshan quake in 1976. Truly, this generation has experienced not just earthquakes but “great earthquakes,” as Luke’s Gospel account puts it. [<i>Awake!</i>, July 8, 1982, p. 16] </p>
<p>As the accompanying Chart III indicates, loss of human life due to earthquakes has mushroomed since 1914. [Chart III is entitled “Earthquake Deaths” and contains the captions “Up to 1914 — 1,800 a year” and “Since 1914 — 25,300 a year”] [<i>Watchtower</i>, May 15, 1983, p. 6] </p>
<p>On the average, about ten times as many have died each year from earthquakes since 1914 as in previous centuries. [<i>Life — How Did It Get Here? By Evolution Or By Creation?</i>, 1985, p. 225]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In the same way that in the late 1980s the Society toned down its earlier adamant claims about earthquake frequency, it has done so with the number of deaths due to earthquakes. This is apparently due to earthquake death figures given in the book by Jonsson and Herbst. Recent Watchtower publications tend to be rather vague about just what is being claimed, not just about earthquakes, but also about the other supposed features of the “composite sign.” The effect of this vagueness is that no one can be sure just what the Society is claiming. This allows for great flexibility in interpreting what was said.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The tendency for the Society to drift toward vagueness and to shift the focus of discussion when hard data has proven its position untenable reaches a new height in the articles “Natural Disasters — A Sign of the Times?” and “Natural Disasters — Is God Responsible?” in the December 1, 1993 <i>Watchtower</i>. Finally admitting that earthquake frequency has always been the same, [“The earth and its dynamic forces have more or less remained the same throughout the ages.” — p. 6] the articles bury this admission in an avalanche of arguments that try to show that natural disasters of all sorts, even ones Jesus never mentioned, are on the increase. Typical is the discussion on page 3, which asks:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Are we seeing more catastrophic earthquakes&#8230; than did generations past? And in spite of advances in science and technology, are proportionately more people suffering as a result? To many the answer is yes. For example, the magazine <i>New Scientist</i> warns that “the world can expect more disasters in the 1990s than in past decades.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Then follows several more quotations about a general increase in natural disasters in the past few decades, and the potential for more increase during and after the 1990s. In the first part of the first article, Matthew 24:3-14 is quoted and commented upon:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“Nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in one place after another. All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress.” With these words Jesus Christ explained to his disciples 19 centuries ago that such disastrous events, together with an increase of lawlessness and the worldwide preaching of the good news of God’s Kingdom, would introduce a composite sign marking “the conclusion of the system of things.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that in the verse quoted, Jesus explicitly named three things that would be the beginning of pangs of distress. He did not say “there will be pangs of distress, of which the following are examples.” There is a big distinction between predicting an assortment of general disasters, and predicting certain specific ones. The accounts in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 make very clear that Jesus predicted only certain kinds of disasters, namely, wars, food shortages, earthquakes and pestilences. The <i>Watchtower</i> article deliberately glosses over this distinction by saying that Jesus predicted, not just those <i>specific</i> events, but “<i>such</i> disastrous events.” This gives the impression, without actually having said so, that Jesus was really talking about many more disasters than just the ones he mentioned. In this manner the reader is set up for the writer’s next arguments, which subtly tie quotations about general natural disasters to the specific one the writer really wants to address, namely, earthquakes. The technique is demonstrated in the second paragraph:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Are we seeing more catastrophic earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, droughts, and famines than did generations past?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Although Jesus only mentioned two out of these five types of events, they are now tied together in the reader’s mind. The quotations that follow in the article, concerning general natural disasters, reinforce the connection. Interestingly, the article makes no direct claim that these disasters have increased since 1914. In any case the arguments reduce to simple assertions that an increase in population-related disasters along with a heightened perception of them fulfills Jesus’ prophecy of Matthew 24:3-14.&nbsp; </p>
<p>By the end of the first article the average reader has the impression that Jesus foretold all kinds of distress, even though he only mentioned four kinds. The reader will not notice that the conclusion the final paragraph of the first article makes is further leading him so that he will not notice the coming abandonment of the long-standing claim that earthquakes are much more severe in the 20th century:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Since the Bible foretells such a time of great distress, does it mean that God is responsible for the disasters and the suffering resulting from them?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The reader is led away from the real point by an emotional appeal — asking whether our loving God is responsible. The writer is a true master of misdirection. Let us see how he further conceals his purpose.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The second article, “Natural Disasters — Is God Responsible?”, asks the question in its title, and then defines a natural disaster as a violent physical event that causes “great destruction of life and property and the disruption of the normal way of life.”&nbsp; </p>
<p>Along the way earthquakes are mentioned prominently as examples of natural disasters. Nowhere does the article claim directly that earthquake deaths are more frequent in the 20th century than previously, but the earlier citations about the general increase of natural disasters give the impression that earthquake deaths are indeed more frequent. This omission avoids having to introduce actual death statistics, which is desirable from the Society’s standpoint because a comparison of 20th century death rates to those in the 18th and 19th centuries shows that the total number of deaths is pretty much the same. This is particularly devastating to the Society’s claims, because it means that the per capita death rate is actually much lower in the 20th century, since the total population is much higher. A comparison of death rates, borrowed from Jonsson and Herbst, is presented in the appendix at the end of this paper. </p>
<p>Thus, having slipped in the impression that earthquakes are more destructive in the 20th century, the article then poses the question: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Thus, when it comes to the increasing destructiveness of natural disasters, we must ask, Have the natural elements become more violent? Or have human factors contributed to the problem?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The article then says that God has created the natural forces and can control them if he wants to, setting the stage for further misdirection. The reader is now concentrating on finding a reason for not holding God responsible for natural disasters, and the article asks:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Can we hold God responsible for the increased havoc and devastation that have resulted from natural disasters in recent times? To answer this question, we must first consider whether there is evidence that the forces of nature have recently become dramatically more violent, perhaps even out of control.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If God is causing or allowing the forces of nature to be out of control, then he is of course directly responsible for any destruction caused by them. The reader is now eager to find a reason to absolve God from such responsibility, and is ready to hear that such disasters really are not fundamentally any worse than they have always been, and so God cannot be responsible:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>In this regard, note what the book <i>Natural Disasters — Acts of God or Acts of Man?</i> has to say: “There is no evidence that the climatological mechanisms associated with droughts, floods and cyclones are changing. And no geologist is claiming that the earth movements associated with earthquakes, volcanoes and tsunami (earthquake waves) are becoming more violent.” Similarly, the book <i>Earthshock</i> observes: “The rocks of every continent contain a record of innumerable major and minor geological events, every one of which would be a catastrophic disaster to mankind if they occurred today — and it is scientifically certain that such events <i>will</i> occur again and again in the future.” <b>In other words, the earth and its dynamic forces have more or less remained the same throughout the ages</b>. Hence, whether or not some statistics indicate an increase of some forms of geologic or other activity, the earth has not become uncontrollably violent in recent times. [boldface added]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Since “the earth and its dynamic forces have more or less remained the same throughout the ages,” earthquakes have also. Thus, with a stroke of the pen, the Society cancels all of its statements that since 1914 earthquakes have occurred more often than ever before. The average reader is completely unaware that anything has been changed, because he has been concentrating on absolving God from responsibility for natural disasters. The article then provides a reason for the absolution — irresponsible human activity. However, it continues to speak about a general increase in frequency and destructiveness of natural disasters, and earthquakes, of course, are in that category:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>What, then, accounts for the increase in the frequency and destructiveness of natural disasters that we read about? If the forces of nature are not to blame, the finger of guilt seems to point to the human element. And, indeed, authorities have recognized that human activities have made our environment both more prone to natural disasters and more vulnerable to them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, by a kind of “guilt by association” earthquakes still remain, in the mind of the average reader, extremely frequent and destructive in the 20th century, even though no direct statement to that effect has been made, and even though earlier claims about frequency have actually been reversed. Ten years from now, after other “softening” arguments have been advanced, the Society will be able to point to this article and say that it had “corrected” an erroneous viewpoint way back in 1993. Any of Jehovah’s Witnesses who then disagree will be unable to argue differently. </p>
<hr size=1/>
<p><strong>Appendix</strong></p>
<p>Are earthquakes in our day really killing more people than ever before? In particular, was there a change after 1914?&nbsp; </p>
<p>In <i>The “Sign” of the Last Days — When?</i> Jonsson and Herbst compiled a list of earthquake deaths for the 68 year period from 1915-1983 and compared them to the 68 year periods 1715-1783 and 1847-1914. The result was that on average about 17,500 people died per year in the 1915-1983 period, while about 20,000 and 18,000 died annually in the latter two periods. These variations are statistically insignificant. We here reproduce the tables from Jonsson and Herbst. </p>
<p><center></p>
<p><strong>A COMPARISON OF EARTHQUAKE VICTIMS</strong></p>
<p></center><br />
<center></p>
<table cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 align=center border=1>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<th vAlign=top>
<p>1715-1783&nbsp;</p>
</th>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<th vAlign=top>
<p>1915-1983:&nbsp;</p>
</th>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>(See <i>Awake!</i> February 22, 1977)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Year&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Location&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>Deaths&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Year&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Location&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>Deaths&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1715&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Algeria&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>20,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1915&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>29,970&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1717&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Algeria&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>20,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1920&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>180,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1718&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>43,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1923&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>143,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1719&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Asia Minor&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1927&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>200,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1721&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>100,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1932&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>70,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1724&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Peru (tsunami)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>18,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1933&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>U.S.A.&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>115&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1725&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Peru&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,500&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1935&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India (Pakistan)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>60,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1725&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>556&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1939&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Chile&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>30,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1726&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1939&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>23,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1727&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>77,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1946&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,300&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1730&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1946&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1730&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>100,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1948&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,131&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1730&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>137,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1949&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Ecuador&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1731&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>100,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1950&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,500&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1732&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,940&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1953&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1736&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>260&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1953&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Greece&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>424&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1737&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>300,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1954&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Algeria&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,657&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1739&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>50,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1956&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Afghanistan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1746&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Peru&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>4,800&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1957&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Northern)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,500&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1749&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Spain&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1957&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Western)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1750&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Greece&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1960&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Chile&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,700&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1751&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1960&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Morocco&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>12,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1751&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>900&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1962&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1752&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Syria&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>20,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1963&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Yugoslavia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,100&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1754&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Egypt&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>40,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1964&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Alaska&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>131&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1755&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>270&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1966&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,529&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1755&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1969&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>11,588&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1755&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Portugal&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>60,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1970&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,086&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1755&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Morocco&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>12,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1970&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Peru&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>66,794&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1757&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1971&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>U.S.A.&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>65&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1759&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Syria&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>30,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1972&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,057&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1763&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1972&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Nicaragua&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1765&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,189&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1973&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Mexico (Western)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>52&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1766&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,335&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1973&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Mexico (Central)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>700&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1771&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan (tsunami)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>11,700&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1974&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Pakistan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1773&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Guatemala&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>20,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1975&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>200&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1774&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Newfoundland&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>300&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1975&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,312&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1778&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Kashan)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>8,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Guatemala&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>23,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1780&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Tabriz)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>100,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>900&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1780&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Khurasan)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Bali&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>600&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1783&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy (Calabria)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>60,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China *&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>242,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1783&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy (Palmi)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,504&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Philippines&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,373&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1783&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy (Monteleone)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,191&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1976&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,790&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>1977-1983 addition +&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>44,623&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>Total 1715-1783:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,373,845&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>Total 1915-1983:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,210,597&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>Annual average:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>19,911&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<p>Annual average:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top<br />
            align=right>
<p>17,545&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></center><br />
<center></p>
<p>* See page 65, footnote 34; compare <i>Awake! </i>July 8, 1982, p. 13.</p>
<p></center><br />
<center></p>
<p>+ Ganse &amp; Nelson list a death figure of 44,623 for this period.</p>
<p><strong>Did 1914 really bring a change?</strong></p>
<p></center><br />
<center></p>
<table cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 align=center border=1>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Year&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Place&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>Deaths&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Year&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Place&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>Deaths&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1847&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>34,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1882&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,313&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1850&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>300-400,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1883&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,990&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1851&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1883&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Greece, Asia Minor&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>15,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1851&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>14,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1883&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Java&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>36,400&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1853&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Shiraz)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>12,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1885&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1853&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran (Isfahan)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1887&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>France&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1 ,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1854&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>34,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1887&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1854&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>El Salvador&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1891&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>7,283&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1855&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,757&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1893&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Western Turkmenia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>18,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1856&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Java&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>3,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1896&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Japan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>27,122&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1857&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1897&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India (Assam)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,542&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1857&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>12,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1902&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Guatemala&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1859&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Ecuador&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>5,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1902&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkestan&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>4,562&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1859&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>15,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1903&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Turkey&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1861&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Argentina&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>7,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1905&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>India (Kangra)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>19,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1863&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Philippines&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1905&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,500&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1868&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Peru&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>40,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1906&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Colombia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1868&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Ecuador, Colombia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>70,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1906&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Formosa&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1 ,300&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1872&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Asia Minor&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,800&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1906&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Chile&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>20,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1875&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Venezuela, Colombia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>16,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1907&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Jamaica&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1 ,400&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1876&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Bay of Bengal&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>215,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1907&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Central Asia&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>12,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1879&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>2,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1908&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Italy&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>110,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1879&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>China&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>10,430&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1909&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Iran&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>6-8,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1880&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Greece (Chios)&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>4,000&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1910&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Costa Rica&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,750&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1881&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Asia Minor&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>8,866&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>&nbsp;</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>1912&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top>
<p>Marmara Sea Coast&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right>
<p>1,958&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=5>
<p>Total victims for 68 years previous to 1914:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right<br />
                colSpan=2>
<p>1,148,973-1,250,973&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td vAlign=top colSpan=5>
<p>Annual average:&nbsp;</p>
</td>
<td vAlign=top align=right<br />
              colSpan=2>
<p>17,149-18,671&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></center></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>SOURCES: Båth: <i>Introduction to Seismology </i>(1979); Richter: <i>Elementary Seismology </i>(1958); Imamura: <i>Theoretical and Applied Seismology </i>(1937); Ganse-Nelson: <i>Catalog of Significant Earthquakes </i>(1981); Ambraseys: <i>Earth-quake Hazard and Vulnerability </i>(1981); Ambraseys-Melville: <i>A History of Persian Earthquakes </i>(1982); Latter: Natural Disasters <i>(Advancement of Science, </i>June 1969); Press-Siever: <i>Earth </i>(1974); <i>Handbuch der Ceophysik </i>(ed. Prof. B Gutenberg), Band IV (Berlin 1932).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As the above data show, reasonably complete studies prove beyond a doubt that the 20th century has not experienced any statistically significant change in earthquake deaths compared to earlier times. As one seismologist wrote, “For earlier centuries we do not have the same reliable statistics, but there are no indications at all of any increase in the activity in the course of time.” Of course, the December 1, 1993 <i>Watchtower</i> mentioned none of this data. Most individual Jehovah’s Witnesses will never examine the data for themselves and so will credulously accept the Society’s word. Even if they did examine the data, their prejudices would almost always cause them to reject it in favor of what “God’s channel” tells them. </p>
<p>
  For a more thorough examination of these issues, see <i>The Sign of the Last Days — When?</i> by Carl Olof Jonsson &amp; Wolfgang Herbst. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/the-watchtower-society-backpedals-on-earthquakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armageddon by 2000 AD says &quot;Jehovah&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/armageddon-by-2000-ad-says-jehovah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/armageddon-by-2000-ad-says-jehovah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the failed prophecy of 1975 JW&#8217;s claimed that Armageddon would come before the year 2000.
B. Stett (assisted by B. J. Kotwall) 
The Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) teach that the Bible is authored by “Jehovah” and that it predicts Armageddon by/before 2000 AD and this they claim is Jehovah’s own interpretation.&#160;&#160;
W i t h i n&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--show=nonsingle-->After the failed prophecy of 1975 JW&#8217;s claimed that Armageddon would come before the year 2000.<!--/show--><span id="more-151"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
"><b><span lang="EN-AU">B. </span></b><span lang="EN-AU"><b>Stett (assisted by B. J. Kotwall)</b> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left" style=" ">The Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) teach that the Bible is authored by “Jehovah” and that it predicts Armageddon by/before 2000 AD and this they claim is Jehovah’s own interpretation.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style=" "><b><span lang="EN-AU">W i t h i n&nbsp; O u r&nbsp; T w e n t i e t h&nbsp; C e n t u r y</span></b></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left" style=" ">Shortly within our twentieth century, the “battle in the&nbsp; day of Jehovah” will begin against the modern antitype of Jerusalem, Christendom.<br />
    <b>The Nations Shall Know That I Am Jehovah -&nbsp; How? </b>1971 p. 216</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">To a JW the &ldquo;battle in the day of Jehovah&rdquo; is the same as Armageddon.&nbsp;It is the destruction, by the forces of nature, divided humankind, and angels of God, of all non-JW people and property.&nbsp;This implies the death of over 99% of the human race by 2000AD. <b>&nbsp; &nbsp; </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><b><span lang="EN-AU">W h e n&nbsp; T h i s&nbsp; P r o p h e c y&nbsp; B e g a n </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">The prophecy of Armageddon by 2000 AD began in 1945 in <b>The</b> <b>Watchtower</b> (February 15 pp. 51-60) in the article <b>The</b> <b>Kingdom Sabbath and Its Lord.&nbsp;</b></p>
<p>  Virtually the same material was repeated in the two editions of <b>Let God Be True</b> (1946; 1952) in the chapter <b>The Sabbath: In Shadow and Reality.</p>
<p>  </b>Let’s follow the 1946 reference.</p>
<p>  Chapter 7 of <b>Let God Be True</b> (1946) says that each of the seven days of&nbsp; creation was 7,000 years long. </p>
<p>  In particular: </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="<br />
text-align:justify;">Man being created toward the close of&nbsp; the sixth day, he was put on earth toward the end of 42,000 years of earth’s preparation. (p. 155) </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">God’s “seventh day” of rest continues 7000 years. (p. 165) </p>
<p>  Also the 1,000 year reign of Christ (the Millennium) corresponds to the last 1,000 years of the 7,000 years of God’s rest. (pp. 167-169)&nbsp; So when did the 7,000 years of rest begin? </p>
<p>  On page 165 it is claimed that the 7,000 year rest, “began applying over 4,000 years before Christ.” </p>
<p>  Ignoring the minor question of there being no year “0” it follows that 6,000 years will be completed by or before 6,000 &#8211; 4000 = 2000 AD. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Page 166 says that the 1,000 year reign of Christ will start “immediately” after Armageddon. Therefore Armageddon will also have to be over by/before 2000 AD. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><b><span lang="EN-AU">C o n n e c t i o n&nbsp; W i t h&nbsp; 1 9 7 5 </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">When <b>Let God Be True</b> was published the JWs believed that Adam was created in 4028 BC. This date is not given in <b>Let God</b> <b>Be True</b> but does appear in <b>The Truth Shall Make You Free</b> (1943 p. 152). In the 1950s the year of Adam’s creation was corrected to 4026 BC. </p>
<p>  Adding 6,000 years to 4,026 BC and allowing for there not being a year “0”&nbsp; results in 1975 exactly. </p>
<p>  However, the 7,000 year rest started, according to JWs, after Eve was created. But 4,026 BC is the year of Adam’s creation. If, for example, Eve was created two years after Adam then 6,000 years into God’s 7,000 year rest would end in 1977. But Armageddon had to be over before the end of 6,000 years of God’s rest &#8211; but we are not told how long before. </p>
<p>  Because of these unknowns &#8211; how long Eve’s creation&nbsp; delayed&nbsp; after Adam’s and how long before end of 6,000 years from Eve’s creation Armageddon would strike &#8211; JWs did not at first predict the world’s end (Armageddon)&nbsp; for 1975&nbsp; with&nbsp; certainty. A usual phrase and estimate used at conventions was “the mid 1970s.” </p>
<p>  Then <b>The Watchtower</b> (1968 May 1 p. 271) and <b>Awake!</b> (1968 October 8 p. 14) announced that Adam and Eve were created in the same year that is in 4,026 BC. This was confirmed in the book <b>Aid To Bible Understanding</b> (1971 p. 538) This removed one of the two uncertainties. From this new information it followed that Armageddon had to be over, and paradise introduced in, or earlier than, 1975. </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1968 May 1 p. 271 <br />
      Thus, Adam’s naming of the animals and his realizing that he needed a counterpart would have occupied only a brief time after his creation. Since it was also Jehovah’s purpose for man to multiply and fill the earth, it is logical that he would create Eve soon after Adam, perhaps just a few weeks or months later in the same year, 4026 B.C.E. After her creation, God’s rest day, the seventh period, immediately followed. <br />
      Therefore, God’s seventh day and the time man has been on earth apparently run parallel. To calculate where man is in the stream of time relative to God’s seventh day of 7,000 years, we need to determine how long a time has elapsed from the year of Adam and Eve’s creation in 4026 B.C.E. From the autumn of that year to the autumn of 1 B.C.E., there would be 4,025 years. From the autumn of 1 B.C.E. to the autumn of 1 C.E. is one year (there was no zero year). From the autumn of 1 C.E. to the autumn of 1967 is a total of 1,966 years. Adding 4,025 and 1 and 1,966, we get 5,992 years from the autumn of 4026 B.C.E. to the autumn of 1967. Thus, eight years remain to account for a full 6,000 years of the seventh day. Eight years from the autumn of 1967 would bring us to the autumn of 1975, fully 6,000 years into God’s seventh day, his rest day. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">When the deadline came and&nbsp; all the prophecies failed, it was announced that Adam and Eve were not created in the same year. (<b>The Watchtower</b> 1975 October 1 p. 579) </p>
<p>  This however left intact the prediction for, “within our twentieth century”. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><b><span lang="EN-AU">O u r&nbsp; O w n&nbsp; T w e n t i e t h &#8211; C e n t u r y&nbsp; G e n e r a t i o n</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left">In&nbsp; 1965 <b>The Watchtower</b> had an article titled, <b>Our Own Twentieth-Century Generation and&nbsp; the Resurrection</b> which said in part: </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span lang="EN-AU">A “great crowd”&#8230;will never go to Ha’des or Sheol and need to be resurrected. However, it will not be so with the “goat” class of our twentieth-century generation. At the destruction of Babylon the Great and in the Battle of Armageddon they will be executed with an everlasting punishment and will never be resurrected from the dead, for they will go into the “second death.” Consequently, at the beginning of Christ’s millennial reign, there will be no “goat class” on hand to interfere with that righteous rule. <br />
      (1965 March 15 p. 177) </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Potentially “Our Own Twentieth-Century Generation” could be “executed” in the twenty-first century. But if that were meant one would expect some mention of the twenty-first-century generation. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Furthermore to a JW of the 1950s to 1980s the phrase “our generation” referred to people old enough to witness with understanding the outbreak of World War I in 1914. “Our generation” and “this generation” therefore meant people born 1900-1905 or earlier. A few references to “this generation” meaning pre-World-War I people are: </span></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp; </span><b><span lang="EN-AU">Awake!</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1966 October 8 p. 18 </span> </p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Awake!</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1968 October 8 pp. 13-14 </span> </p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1969 February 15 p. 101 </span> </p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1974 June 15 p. 359 </span> </p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Awake!</span></b> 1981 July 22 p. 4&nbsp; </p>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp; <br />
  </span><b><span lang="EN-AU">A&nbsp; F i r m&nbsp; A n d&nbsp; D e f i n i t e&nbsp; P r o p h e c y </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><b><span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp; </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">The prophecy of Armageddon in our twentieth century continues as a firm and definite prophecy: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1984 March 1 pp. 18-19 <br />
      Some of that “generation” could survive until the end of the century. But there are many indications that “the end” is much closer than that! </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-AU">1989 Yearbook of Jehovah’s Witnesses</span></b> p. 3. <br />
      How many will accept the invitation? John’s vision recorded in Revelation 7:9 had to become a reality. He saw “a great crowd, which no man was able to number, out of all nations and tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, dressed in white robes; and there were palm branches in&nbsp; their hands.” With confidence in the vision’s complete fulfillment during the decades of this 20th century the anointed remnant of the bride class have never let up in saying “Come!” Every effort has been made to broadcast the message to all nations. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp; </span><b><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower 1989</span></b> January 1 p. 12 <br />
      The apostle Paul was spearheading the Christian missionary activity. He was also laying a foundation for a work that would be concluded in our 20th century.&nbsp; </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">The quotes from the <b>Yearbook</b> and the 1989 <b>Watchtower</b> in effect say the same thing. This is that the JW preaching work, with everyone who will survive Armageddon having become a JW, will be completed in the 20th century. And every JW knows that the end of the preaching work coincides with the eruption of&nbsp; “the great tribulation” and “Armageddon”. </p>
<p>  The 1989 <b>Watchtower</b> quote is from the single-issue printing of <b>The Watchtower</b>. In the bound volume reprints the quote was changed to: </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">He was also laying a foundation for a work that would be completed in our day. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Despite this revision, the prophecy of “in our 20th century” remains an official doctrine which we’ll see next:<br />
  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><b><span lang="EN-AU">A r m a g e d d o n&nbsp; N o t&nbsp; F u r t h e r&nbsp; T h a n&nbsp; W e&nbsp; H a d&nbsp; T h o u g h t </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">The final generation of this world was first clearly linked to 1914 in 1953. That was in the booklet </span><b><span lang="EN-AU">Basis for Belief in a Righteous New World</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> (p.51). An earlier booklet <b>Evolution Versus The New World</b> (1950 p.53) discussed “this generation” in a 1914 context but didn’t clearly link the two ideas together except by implication. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Later there were quotes like: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">Even if we presume that youngsters 15 years of age would be perceptive enough to realize the import of what happened in 1914, it would still make the youngest of&nbsp; “this generation” nearly 70 years old today. <br />
      <b>Awake!</b> 1968 October 8 p. 13-14 </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">This doctrine and prophecy was taught as “the Creator’s promise”. From January 1982 <b>Awake!</b> magazine had the claim: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Most importantly, this magazine builds confidence in the Creator’s promise of a peaceful and secure new order before the generation that saw the events of 1914 C.E. passes away. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">In 1995 this promise was revised to: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Most important, this magazine builds confidence in the Creator’s promise of a peaceful and secure new world that is about to replace the present wicked, lawless system of things. <br />
      <b>Awake!</b> 1995 November 8 </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">In discussing this revision <b>The Watchtower</b> said: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Does our more precise viewpoint on “this generation” mean that Armageddon is further away than we had thought? Not at all! <br />
      (1995 November 1 p. 20) </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Well, how close had the JWs “thought” and prophesied Armageddon to be? The answer is that people born around 1900 would live to see Armageddon and it would happen “within our twentieth century”. </p>
<p>  That only leaves two years from the present &#8211; 1998. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><b><span lang="EN-AU">A l l&nbsp; J W&nbsp; T e a c h i n g&nbsp; I s&nbsp; F r o m&nbsp; “ J e h o v a h ” </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">JW leaders claim that their organization is, “the only organization on earth that understands the ‘deep things of God’!” (<b>The Watchtower</b> 1973 July 1 p. 402) </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">They call their propaganda “true religion” and say of true religion, “its teachings must all be in harmony with God’s word.” (<b>The Truth that Leads to Eternal Life</b> 1968 p. 130) </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">The official position is well expressed in <b>The Watchtower</b> of 1931: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower recognizes the truth as belonging to Jehovah, and not to any creature. The Watchtower is not the instrument of any man or set of men. No man’s opinion is expressed in The Watchtower. God feeds his own people, and surely God uses those who love and serve him according to his own will. <br />
      (November 1 p. 327) </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">Furthermore <b>The Watchtower</b> (1943 July 1 p. 202) says: “Jehovah God is therefore the only&nbsp; Supreme Court of interpretation of His inspired word.” The subsequent page adds: </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">To such remnant of faithful servants of&nbsp; Jehovah God Christ Jesus has entrusted all “his goods”, or earthly interests of the Kingdom. This does not signify that the faithful remnant or society of Jehovah’s anointed witnesses are an earthly tribunal of interpretation, delegated to interpret the Scriptures and its prophecies. No; Christ Jesus the King has not entrusted that office to them. THE SUPREME COURT STILL INTERPRETS, thank God; and Christ Jesus, the Court’s official mouthpiece of interpretation, reserves to himself that office as head of Jehovah’s “faithful and wise servant” class. <u>He merely uses the “servant” class to publish the interpretation after the Supreme Court by Christ Jesus reveals it. <br />
      </u>(p. 203) </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">The “Creator’s promise” regarding the 1914 generation has already been discussed. That “promise” is also “Jehovah’s prophetic word”: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Jehovah’s prophetic word through Christ Jesus is: “This generation [of 1914] will by no means pass away until all things occur.” (Luke 21:32) And Jehovah, who is the source of inspired and unfailing prophecy, will bring about the fulfillment&#8230; <br />
      <b>The Watchtower</b> 1984 May 15 pp. 6-7 </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">From statements such as these it follows that if Armageddon by 2000 AD fails to occur the “Jehovah” of the JWs will be exposed as a liar.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">
  <b><span lang="EN-AU">J W&nbsp; P r o p h e c y&nbsp; T o&nbsp; F a i l&nbsp; A g a i n</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">JW prophecies are known to have failed for many other dates. These include 1878, 1881, 1906/1907, 1912, 1914, 1915, 1918, 1920, 1924, 1925, 1928, 1930s, 1935/1936, 1942, 1940s, 1970s. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-AU">Generalizing from this trend of failure the prophecy of “within our twentieth century” should prove to be false. </span></p>
<p align="center" style="text-align:center"><font size="2" color="#000000"><span lang="EN-AU"><o :p></o></span></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/armageddon-by-2000-ad-says-jehovah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boastful lies</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/boastful-lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/boastful-lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After switching Jesus’ “return” from 1874 to 1914 the WTS writers began to claim that their early Bible Students had anticipated 1914 as the date of Christ’s “presence” from their beginnings!
(From: INVESTIGATOR MAGAZINE No. 72 2000 May)
B. J. Kotwall 
A faithful witness is one that will not lie, but a false witness launches forth&#160; mere [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--show=nonsingle-->After switching Jesus’ “return” from 1874 to 1914 the WTS writers began to claim that their early Bible Students had anticipated 1914 as the date of Christ’s “presence” from their beginnings!<!--/show--><span id="more-150"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span lang="EN-AU">(From: INVESTIGATOR MAGAZINE No. 72 2000 May)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-AU">B. J. Kotwall</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><i>A faithful witness is one that will not lie, but a false witness launches forth&nbsp; mere lies.&nbsp;</i>(Proverbs 14:5 NWT) &nbsp; </p>
<p> <span lang="EN-AU"><b><u>“THE SCRIPTURES SHOW” JESUS RETURNED IN 1874</u><br />
  </b>From 1876 Charles T Russell (who founded the Watchtower Society—the publishing/legal channel of the Jehovah’s Witness sect) promoted 1874 as the date for Christ’s return and the start of Christ’s “invisible presence”.</span> </p>
<p>That Christ returned in 1874 was official doctrine until 1930.&nbsp;&nbsp; Note:</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">&#8230;the Bridegroom came in the Autumn of 1874, and he appeared to the eyes of faith—seen by the light of the lamp—the Word.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">(Zion’s Watch Tower Reprints October/November 1881 p. 289) </span> <span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-AU">Our Lord’s presence as Bridegroom and Reaper was recognized during the first three and a half years, from A.D. 1874 to A.D. 1878. Since that time it has been emphatically manifest that the time had come in A.D. 1878 when kingly judgment should begin at the house of God. </span> <span lang="EN-AU">(Studies in the Scriptures Vol. II 1889 p. 239) </span> <span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-AU">…he [Jesus] would in reality assume the kingly office, power, etc.; viz., in the spring of 1878, three and a half years after his second advent at the beginning of the harvest period, in the fall of 1874.<br />
      <b>Studies in the Scriptures</b> Volume III 1891 p. 234 </p>
<p>      Our Lord, the appointed King, is now present since October 1874, A.D., according to the testimony of the prophets, to those who have ears to hear it: and the formal inauguration of his kingly office dates from April 1878, A.D.<br />
      <b>Studies in Scriptures </b> Vol. IV 1897 p. 621</p>
<p>      Pastor Russell&#8230;believed and taught that we are living in the time of the second presence of our Lord, and that his presence dates from 1874&#8230; <br />
      <b>WT</b> December 1, 1916 p. 5998</p>
<p>      Fall 1874 A.D. Second Advent of the Lord <br />
      <b>The Finished Mystery</b> 1917 p. 60</p>
<p>      Some of the Scriptures, which, when understood in their connections and significance, prove that the Lord’s Second Advent occurred in the Fall of 1874 are as follows:<br />
      [A list of 88 interpretations followed] <br />
…and these are but 88 of the proofs hastily collected. <br />
      <b>The Finished Mystery</b> 1917 pp. 68, 71</p>
<p>      The time of the Lord’s second presence dates from 1874&#8230; <br />
      <b>The Harp of God</b> 1921 p. 231</p>
<p>      The Scriptures show that the second presence (of the Lord) was due in 1874&#8230; This proof shows that the Lord has been present since 1874&#8230; <br />
      <b>WT</b> March 1, 1923 p. 67</p>
<p>      Surely there is not the slightest room for doubt that in the mind of a truly consecrated child of God that the Lord Jesus Christ is present and has been since 1874. <br />
      <b>WT</b> January 1, 1924 p. 5</p>
<p>      The second coming of the Lord therefore began in 1874&#8230; <br />
      <b>Creation</b> 1927 pp. 289, 291, 297, 298, 318) <br />
      The Scriptural proof is that the second presence of the Lord Jesus Christ began in 1874 A.D. <br />
      <b>Prophecy</b> 1929 p. 65</p>
<p>      From 1874 onward is the time of the Lord’s second presence, as above stated… his circumstantial evidence fulfilling prophecy is what constitutes the physical facts, and is proof corroborative of the Lord’s presence since 1874…His presence beginning in 1874, he has carried on his harvest work from 1874 forward… <br />
      <b>Our Lord’s Return</b> 1929 pp. 27, 33, 37</p>
<p>      </span> </p>
</blockquote>
<p><u><b>JESUS’ “RETURN” SWITCHED FROM 1874 TO 1914 </b><br />
  </u>In 1930 Christ’s return and “presence” was switched from 1874 to 1914. </p>
<p>  In <i>The Golden Age</i> magazine (1930 p.503) Joseph Rutherford, the second president of the WTS, wrote “Jesus has been present since 1914” but he gave no supporting explanation.&nbsp;&nbsp; In 1932:<span lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">The prophecy of the Bible, fully supported by the physical facts in fulfilment thereof, shows that the second coming of Christ dates from the fall of the year 1914. <br />
      <b>What is Truth?</b> 1932</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Until 1943 there was little further mention of this doctrinal change.&nbsp; Then in 1943 the WTS published <i>The Truth Shall Make You Free</i> which revised the WTS’s Bible chronology by bringing the date of Adam’s creation 100 years forward.&nbsp; This removed any remaining prophetic significance of 1874. Christ’s return in 1914 thus became the official truth for Jehovah’s Witnesses (JWs).</p>
<p>  After switching Jesus’ “return” from 1874 to 1914 the WTS writers began to claim or imply that their early Bible Students had anticipated 1914 as the date of Christ’s “presence” from their beginnings! </p>
<p>  Consider some examples:</p>
<p>  <b><u>DECEIFUL CLAIM REGULARLY REPEATED</u></b></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>As for the time of Christ’s second presence, Daniel’s prophecy is again the one that gives the chronology for it. (Dan. 4:16) It<u> </u>was figured out as pointing to A.D. 1914, and The Watchtower<u> </u>called notice to the significance of 1914 in the year 1879. <br />
      <b>WT</b><i> </i>1952 November 1, p. 658</p>
<p>      Why, then, do the nations not realize and accept the approach of this climax of judgment? It is because they have not heeded the world wide advertising of Christ’s return and his second Presence.&nbsp; Since long before World War I Jehovah’s witnesses<u> </u>pointed to 1914 as the time for this great event to occur. <br />
      <b>WT</b> 1954 June 15 p. 370</p>
<p>      Bible chronology also fixes the time for Christ’s second<u> </u>presence and the assuming of his right to rule as at 1914; this date was published in the Watchtower as early as 1879, 35 years<u> </u>before 1914. <br />
      Tract: <b> Sign of Christ’s Presence</b> 1955 p. 3</p>
<p>…history confirms that Jehovah’s witnesses were the only Christian group found awake as to 1914… <br />
      <b>WT</b> 1960 July 15 p. 433</p>
<p>      As we look back over the years, we can clearly see how God’s organization in modern times has progressed in understanding. For example, it learned that Christ’s second presence was to be in the spirit, and not in the flesh as many professed Christians believe. His rule would be from the heavens. This was a new revelation of great importance to God’s people who had been <i>anxiously </i>awaiting his second presence toward the end of the<u> </u>nineteenth century.<i> <br />
      </i><b>WT</b><i> </i>1965 July 15 p. 428</p>
<p>      For over thirty years before that date and for half a century since, Jehovah’s witnesses have pointed to the year 1914 as<i> </i>the time for the end of “the appointed times of the nations” and the time in which Christ would begin his Kingdom rule.<i> </i>(Luke 21:24) <br />
      <b>WT</b> 1966 February 15 p. 103</p>
<p>&nbsp;“Do you believe in the second advent of the Lord?”&nbsp; I asked the young man [a WTS colporteur in 1928] who came to the door. “Christ’s second advent was realized in 1914” he answered. In astonishment, I told him that was impossible. “You should read this book,” he said, handing me <i>The Harp of God. </i>I was baptized the following year, March 23, 1929&#8230; <br />
      <b>WT</b> 1988 May 1 p. 22<br />
      [Note: Nowhere in <i>The Harp of God </i>(1921) is the “second advent” of Christ put in 1914.&nbsp; On the contrary, 1874 as the date of the “presence” of Jesus is mentioned in <i>The Harp of God</i> on pages 230, 231, 234, 235, 236, 237 241, 244, 271).&nbsp; Also “the young man” could not have known in 1928 that “Christ’s second advent” was realized in 1914” because that teaching had not been published at that time! Even the later editions of <i>The Harp of God</i> (1937 &amp; 1940) retained 1874 as the date of Christ’s “presence”.]</p>
<p>      He [a WTS colporteur of 1921] explained to me that Jesus had been present since 1914, invisible to man. This was the most thrilling news I had ever heard&#8230; In late 1921 I was transferred back to England, and in the spring of 1922, I was discharged from the army. <br />
      <b>WT</b> l990 September 1 p. 11<br />
      [Note: When this purported conversation occurred in 1921 no WTS publication had mentioned 1914 as the date for the “return of Christ’’—nor for nine years afterwards!] </p>
<p>      <span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower has <u>consistently</u> presented evidence<i>…</i>that Jesus’ presence in heavenly Kingdom power began in 1914. Events since that year testify to Jesus’ presence. <br />
      <b>WT </b> 1993 January 15, p. 5</p>
<p>…a prophecy providentially caused sincere 19th-century Bible students<i> </i>to be in expectation. By linking the “seven times” of Daniel 4:25 with “the times of the Gentiles”, they anticipated<i><u> </u></i>that Christ would receive Kingdom power in 1914.<i> <br />
      </i><b>WT</b> 1998 September 15 p. 15</p>
<p>      </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU"><u><b>IGNORANT DUMB DOGS REJECT 1874 </b><br />
  </u>So certain was the 1874 date still in 1929 that Rutherford, the WTS’s second president, warned against ministers who disagreed with that date as follows: </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Paul was a real Christian. He was not a D.D., unable to understand, such as are the D.D.’s of this present time. (Isaiah 56:10, 11)&nbsp; Here the prophet says that some who claim to be watchmen will be blind and ignorant; and that these would be ‘d-d-s, sleeping and lying down, loving slumber’. He then says that they are greedy, never able to get enough, shepherds of congregations that can not understand; that they look out only for themselves, to get gain from their own congregations. <br />
      <b>Our Lord’s Return </b> 1929 p. 21</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To followers of Rutherford the abbreviation “D.D.” or “d.d.” meant dumb dog but was also a pun on “Doctor of Divinity”.&nbsp; The pun was a Rutherford joke for 25 years: </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">[C T Russell]…had too much of God’s work to do to pay attention to the yelpings of little men—of the D.D’s of Christendom (Isa. 56:10), who love slumber, but who snarl and bite when disturbed in their dreams of “peace, peace” (Jer. 6:14), social and civic gospels, church unity, and evangelistic raids on the pockets of the masses. <b>The Finished Mystery </b> 1917 p. 383</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><i>Consolation</i> magazine (1940 March 6 p. 24 Australian edition) carried the joke further with a photo of a dog wearing a sign advertising a Rutherford lecture.&nbsp; The caption to the photo is “NOT A DUMB DOG”.</p>
<p>  Pastors, church ministers and Doctor’s of Divinity were people most likely to demonstrate the nonsense of Christ’s return in 1874.&nbsp; Hence the booklet <i>Our Lord’s Return</i> – prior to discussing 1874 in detail &#8211; disposed of them as “blind”, “ignorant” and “D.D.’s” </p>
<p>  Incidentally, thousands of anti-church comments like the above between 1917 and 1942 – mingled with ever-changing doctrines all labelled “truth” and with self-praises such as “peaceful Christians”, “saintly”, “watchful”, “enlightened”, etc – were leading causes of persecution of JWs during that era. But that’s another story. Here the quote regarding “D.D.s” is used to show how certain the 1874 date still was in 1929.<span lang="EN-AU"></p>
<p>  </span></p>
<p><u><b>WHAT WAS PREDICTED FOR 1914? </b><br />
  </u>The early JWs or Russellites did preach about 1914 but not as the date for Christ’s “invisible presence” since that, to them, occurred in 1874.&nbsp; What they did predict for 1914/1915 is that they themselves would ascend to Heaven, the world’s nations and religions would be destroyed, and the survivors would be ruled by the Old Testament heroes like Abraham who would be resurrected and live in Jerusalem!&nbsp; For example:<span lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">Be not surprised then, when in subsequent chapters we present proofs that the setting up of the Kingdom of God is already begun, that it is pointed out in prophecy as due to begin the exercise of power in A.D. 1878, and that the ‘battle of the great day of God Almighty’ (Rev. 16:14) which will end in A.D. 1915, with the complete overthrow of earth’s present rulership, is already commenced. <br />
      <b>Studies in the Scriptures</b> Volume II, 1889, p. 101</p>
<p>      And with the end of A.D. 1914, what God calls Babylon, and which men call Christendom, will have passed away, as already shown from prophecy. <br />
      <b>Studies in the Scriptures</b> Volume III, 1891, p. 153</p>
<p>      </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><u><b>JWs ADMIT MISTAKES </b><br />
  </u>WTS writers sometimes publish “recollections” of aged JWs—like the two above. Their reminiscences – that in the 1920s it was taught Christ came in 1914 &#8211; are false.&nbsp; Historically the things “remembered” are anachronisms and could not have happened.&nbsp; Anyone who taught in the 1920s that Christ returned in 1914 would have been expelled and shunned for apostasy! </p>
<p>  WTS publications say that JWs admit mistakes:<span lang="EN-AU"> </span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">Be big enough to admit a mistake…In striking contrast to the position taken by the popes is that taken by the Christian witnesses of Jehovah. They readily admit to having made mistakes as to doctrine and worship. <br />
      <b>WT</b> 1972 November 1 p. 643-644</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>JW Leaders publish lies about what was predicted for 1914, yet boast that the early followers were correct regarding 1914 even though they were wrong, and then boast again that JWs “readily admit…mistakes” when in fact they don’t readily do so!&nbsp;&nbsp; That’s why this article is called “Boastful Lies”. </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">A religion that teaches lies cannot be true.<br />
      WT 1991 December 1, p. 7</span></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/boastful-lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTS falsifies its History</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/wts-falsifies-its-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/wts-falsifies-its-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the most frequently repeated lie in the Watchtower publications is that from 1876 onwards they forecasted that 1914 marked the START of “the conclusion of the system of things”
B. J. Kotwall
Perhaps the
              most frequently repeated lie in the Watchtower Society’s (WTS) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--show=nonsingle-->Perhaps the most frequently repeated lie in the Watchtower publications is that from 1876 onwards they forecasted that 1914 marked the START of “the conclusion of the system of things”<!--/show--><span id="more-149"></span></p>
<p align="center" style="text-align:center"><span lang="EN-AU"><b>B. J. Kotwall</b></span></p>
<p align="left"><span lang="EN-AU"></span><span lang="EN-AU">Perhaps the<br />
              most frequently repeated lie in the Watchtower Society’s (WTS) publications<br />
              is that from 1876 onwards</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span>- 38 years before 1914 &#8211; they forecasted that 1914 marked<br />
              the START of “the conclusion of the system of things”. <o :p><br />
              </o><o :p> </o></p>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">In support the WTS often quotes the <b>Bible<br />
              Examiner</b>. This paper was published by one</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span>George Storrs (1796-1879) who greatly influenced Charles<br />
              Russell the first president of the WTS. Russell wrote in the<b><br />
              Bible Examiner</b> of 1876 an article called<b><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span>Gentile Times: When Do They End?<br />
              </b> This article is frequently referred in WTS publications but<br />
              has never been quoted in full for obvious reasons.<o :p><br />
            </o></p>
<p align="left"><span lang="EN-AU">We are quoting below an extract<br />
              from this article to show that what WTS now says about what Russell</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span>actually wrote in 1876 is dishonest. Russell referring to<br />
              the Gentile Times as a period of 2520 years wrote: <o :p> </o><br />
              <o :p> </o> </p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">At<br />
              the commencement of our Christian era, 606 years of this time had<br />
              passed…which deducted from 2520, would show that the seven times<br />
              would end in 1914…We will ask, but not now answer, another question:<br />
              If the Gentile Times end in 1914, (and there are many other and<br />
              clearer evidences pointing to the same time) and we are told that<br />
              it shall be with fury poured out; a time of trouble such as never<br />
              was before, nor ever shall be; a day of wrath etc., how long before<br />
              does the church escape? as Jesus says, “watch that ye may be accounted<br />
              worthy to escape those things coming upon the world”.</span><b><span lang="EN-AU"><br />
              <o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU"><b>Bible Examiner </b>October 1876<br />
              pp. 27-28<o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">The fact is that<br />
              the article by Russell does not and could not have referred to 1914<br />
              as the START of the “conclusion of the system of things”. Russell<br />
              firmly believed that “the conclusion of the system of things” (also<br />
              called the “time of the end”) began in 1799, and that Christ came<br />
              invisibly in 1874 and that the church would “escape” before 1914.<br />
              It was taught by Russell almost right up to 1914, that 1914 was<br />
              going to be the END of the “system of things”. <o :p> </o> </p>
<p>              For example:<o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">We<br />
              see no reason in changing the figures &#8211; nor could we change them<br />
              if we</span><span style="mso-spacerun:<br />
yes">&nbsp; </span>would. They are, we believe, God’s dates, not ours. But bear<br />
              in mind that the end of 1914 is not the date for the beginning,<br />
              but for the end of the time of trouble.<b><span lang="EN-AU"><br />
              <o :p> </o> <br />
              The Watchtower</span></b><span lang="EN-AU"> July 15, 1894 p. 226<br />
              <o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">…the<br />
              full end of the times of the Gentiles, i.e., the full end of their<br />
              lease of dominion, will be reached in A.D. 1914; and that date will<br />
              be the farthest limit of the rule of imperfect men</span><b><span lang="EN-AU">.</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span><o :p> </o> <br />
              The Time Is At Hand</b><span lang="EN-AU"> 1889 p. 76-77.<br />
              <o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">Following are a<br />
              few extracts from WTS’s CD-ROM acclaiming or implying their sham<br />
              prescience about 1914 marking the START of “the conclusion of the<br />
              system of things”.<o :p> </o> </span><b><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">&nbsp;<o :p><br />
              </o> </span></b></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Awake!<br />
              1973 1/22 p. 8<o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">Of all men used by God to prophesy,<br />
              Jesus is outstanding. Based on what he said, along with the words<br />
              of Daniel and John, Jehovah’s witnesses pointed to the year 1914,<br />
              decades in advance*, as marking the start of “the conclusion of<br />
              the system of things.”<o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">&nbsp;<o :p><br />
              </o> *See, for example, the <i>Bible</i> <i>Examiner,</i> Vol.<br />
              XXI, No. 1 (Whole No. 313), October 1876, pages 27, 28.<o :p> </o><br />
              <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Awake!<br />
              1973 10/8 p.18<o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">So counting from 607 B.C.E. when the<br />
              Gentile nations gained exclusive domination of the earth, when do<br />
              those “appointed times” end?<o :p> </o> <br />
              The answer is 1914. Jehovah’s witnesses pointed to that year as<br />
              early as 1876 in an article written by C. T. Russell and published<br />
              in the <i>Bible</i> <i>Examiner.</i> Thirty-eight years later that<br />
              marked year of 1914 arrived. <o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Yearbook<br />
              1975 p.37<o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">Even earlier, however, C. T. Russell<br />
              wrote an article entitled “Gentile Times: When Do They End?” It<br />
              was published in the <i>Bible</i> <i>Examiner</i> of October 1876,<br />
              and therein Russell said: “The seven times will end in A.D. 1914.”<br />
              He had correctly linked the Gentile Times with the “seven times”<br />
              mentioned in the book of Daniel. (Dan. 4:16, 23, 25, 32) True to<br />
              such calculations, 1914 did mark the end of those times and the<br />
              birth of God’s kingdom in heaven with Christ Jesus as king. Just<br />
              think of it! Jehovah granted his people that knowledge nearly four<br />
              decades before those times expired.<o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The<br />
              Watchtower 1981 2/15 p. 10<o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">Hence, another respected authority<br />
              (Harold Macmillan) adds his voice to those of numerous statesmen<br />
              and historians who, in looking back, recognized the significance<br />
              of the year 1914. Yet, decades before that year arrived, dedicated<br />
              students of Bible prophecy were able to identify 1914 as a climactic<br />
              turning point. (The “Bible Examiner,” October 1876, pp. 27, 28)<br />
              These Bible prophecies also reveal that the “generation” that saw<br />
              the events beginning in 1914 would also see the “conclusion of the<br />
              system of things.”—Matt. 24:3, 7-22, 32-35.<o :p> </o> <o :p> </o><br />
              </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The<br />
              Watchtower 1983 5/15 p. 16 </span></b><span lang="EN-AU"><o :p> </o><br />
              <br />
              As early as in the year 1876, in an article that he submitted for<br />
              publishing in <i>The</i> <i>Bible</i> <i>Examiner,</i> the president<br />
              had pointed forward to 1914 as the date for “the times of the Gentiles”<br />
              to end, with serious consequences for the whole world of mankind.<br />
              (Luke 21:24, <i>Authorized</i> <i>Version)</i> Amazingly, at the<br />
              time that the president announced to the Brooklyn Bethel family<br />
              that the Gentile Times had ended, the first world war of all human<br />
              history was in its 66th day.<o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Revelation<br />
              &#8211; Its grand Climax At Hand! (1989)</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span>p.105 </b><span lang="EN-AU"><o :p> </o> <br />
              From the mid-1870’s, Jehovah’s people had been anticipating that<br />
              catastrophic events would start in 1914 and would mark the end of<br />
              the Gentile Times.<o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">The<br />
              Watchtower 1990 10/15 p. 19 <o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">For 38 years prior to 1914, the Bible<br />
              Students, as Jehovah’s Witnesses were then called, pointed to that<br />
              date as the year when the Gentile Times would end. What outstanding<br />
              proof that is that they were true servants of Jehovah!&nbsp;<o :p><br />
              </o> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><b><span lang="EN-AU">Our<br />
              Incoming World Government (1977) p. 131 <o :p> </o> <br />
              </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">Ever since the year 1876 those who<br />
              became associated with the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society and<br />
              the International Bible Students Association had been publicly declaring<br />
              that the Gentile Times would terminate in early autumn of 1914.<br />
              <o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">What should be remembered<br />
              is that the present leaders of the WTS have rescued only the phrase<br />
              “end of the Gentile Times” from pre-1914 WTS publications as can<br />
              be seen from the above quotations. What they deceitfully do not<br />
              tell is that 1914 marked, in pre-1914 publications, the end of the<br />
              world and the ushering in of Armageddon at that time.<o :p> </o><br />
              <o :p> </o> </span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">The</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;<br />
              </span><b>Watchtower</b> says:<o :p> </o> <o :p> </o> </p>
<p style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-AU">A<br />
              religion that teaches lies cannot be true. <o :p> </o> <br />
              </span><b><span lang="EN-AU">The Watchtower </span></b><span lang="EN-AU">December<br />
              1, 1991 p. 7<o :p> </o></span><font color="#000000"><span lang="EN-AU"><o :p></o></span></font><font size="2" color="#000000"><span lang="EN-AU"><o :p></o></span></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/wts-falsifies-its-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#039;1975&#039;-prophecy and its impact among Dutch Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/the-1975-prophecy-and-its-impact-among-dutch-jehovahs-witnesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/the-1975-prophecy-and-its-impact-among-dutch-jehovahs-witnesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 11:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Singelenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8216;1975&#8242;-prophecy and its impact among Dutch Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses 
It separated the wheat from the chaff 
[Sociological Analysis 50(1)1989, pp 23-40 ]  
(Also published in Jon R. Stone (ed.)&#160; Expecting Armageddon. Essential Readings in Failed Prophecy. New York, Routledge, 2000) 

  Abstract  

&#160;  The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, the world-wide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--show=nonsingle-->The &#8216;1975&#8242;-prophecy and its impact among Dutch Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses <!--/show--><span id="more-148"></span></p>
<p align="center"><b>It separated the wheat from the chaff</b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">[<i>Sociological Analysis</i> 50(1)1989, pp 23-40 ] </span><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;">(Also published in Jon R. Stone (ed.)&nbsp; <i>Expecting Armageddon. Essential Readings in Failed Prophecy</i>. New York, Routledge, 2000) </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "><br />
  Abstract </span> </b></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB">The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, the world-wide organization of Jehovah&#8217;s witnesses, marked the year 1975 as significant: the apocalypse might take place. The proselytizing activities of the Dutch adherents were greatly influenced by this prediction: a significant increase in missionary zeal prior to that date, followed by a similar decline afterwards. <br />
    </span><span lang="EN-GB">The latter phenomenon looks contrary to cognitive dissonance theorizing, according to which an increase in missionary attempts is hypothesized (Festinger et al. 1964). It is questionable, however, if Festinger&#8217;s theory is relevant in this particular case, mainly because of the ambiguous formulation of the prophecy and in-group characteristics among the adherents. Also it is proposed, that dissonance may have played a greater part in the period prior to 1975 than afterwards, mainly because of doctrinal characteristics of the Watchtower ideology.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Introduction</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; In 1966 the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, the organization of Jehovah&#8217;s witnesses, published a book, which said on pages 28 and 29: </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;According to &#8230; trustworthy Bible chronology six thousand years from man&#8217;s creation will end in 1975, and the seventh period of a thousand years of human history will begin in the fall of 1975 CE. So six thousand years of man&#8217;s existence on earth will soon be up, yes, within this generation.&quot; <sup>1 </sup></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">It was the first of a sequence of statements in the Society&#8217;s literature on the importance of &#8216;1975&#8242;: would that year herald the beginning of Christ&#8217;s millennium reign, implicating doom for the non-believers? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Let it be clear from the outset, that the Society in its literature <i>never</i> proclaimed flat out that 1975 would be the definite end of this world and its population. Nevertheless, the formulations from 1966 onward on what <i>might</i> happen in that year, the sense of urgency on a <i>probable</i> apocalyptic event, later followed by a <i>possibility</i> of a cataclysm, had a startling impact on the proselytizing activities of the Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses.<br />
  </span> <br />
&nbsp; As Festinger et al. hypothesized, non-materialization of a religious movement&#8217;s prophecy will result in increased proselytizing in order to reduce cognitive dissonance (Festinger et al. 1964: 25). However, up to now, the theory has only been tested among relatively small, isolated groups with a distinctive ideology, not being part of an umbrella organization (see, for example Hardyck &amp; Braden 1962, Balch et al. 1983). In contrast, what were the effects among the 30,000-odd Jehovah&#8217;s witnesses in Holland when the, it&#8217;s true, ambiguous prophecy did not occur? The ambivalence of the prophecy poses the problem as to the applicability of the theory, since one of the conditions Festinger states is that &quot;the belief must be sufficiently specific.&quot;&nbsp; As will be shown below, this requirement is hardly met. Based on quantitative data of the proselytizing activities of Dutch Jehovah&#8217;s witnesses during the period 1961-1987, an attempt will be made to explain the rise and decline of the missionary zeal of the adherents.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The Prophecy</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;<br />
"> </p>
<p>  </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; According to the Watchtower Society&#8217;s doctrine, man was created in the autumn of 4026 BCE.<sup>2</sup> So, in the fall of 1975, the first 6,000 years of human existence would come to an end. The crucial question if this period corresponded with God&#8217;s &#8216;rest day&#8217;, to be followed by the seventh millennium of God&#8217;s reign, as stated in the Book of Revelations, was the essence of the prophecy. For, this transition had to be marked by the final battle of Armageddon, implicating world-wide doom. From 1966 through 1975, this theme was a recurring topic in the Society&#8217;s literature. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Analysis of these articles reveals three characteristics. First, contrary to the Society&#8217;s marked uncompromising ideological jargon, the prophecy contains a definite &#8216;uncertainty&#8217;-clause. The following example is illustrative: </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;It (the book <i>Life Everlasting</i>, see note 1. RS) shows that 6000 years of human experience will end in 1975, about nine years from now. What does that mean? Does it mean that God&#8217;s rest day began in 4026 BCE? It could have. The &#8230; book does not say it did not. &#8230; You can accept it or reject it. &#8230; Does it mean that Armageddon is going to be finished &#8230; by 1975? It could! It could! All things are possible with God. Does it mean that Babylon the Great is going to go down by 1975? It could. &#8230; But we are not saying.&quot; [Frederick Franz, the then vice-president of the Society, during a speech, quoted in <i>The Watchtower</i> (hereafter WT) Oct. 15, 1966]. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">&nbsp; Secondly, the degree of uncertainty in the prophecy&#8217;s formulations increases, as 1975 drew nearer. Were the chances on Armageddon initially considered as &#8216;feasible&#8217;, &#8216;appar­ent&#8217; or &#8216;appropriate&#8217;, from the end of 1968 onward it is a mere &#8216;possibility&#8217; (WT Oct. 15, 1966; May 1, 1968; <i>Awake!</i> [hereafter Aw] Oct. 8, 1966; Oct 8, 1968;&nbsp; WT Aug. 15, 1968). So, in 1968 the Society considered its chronological calculations as &quot;reasonably accurate (but admittedly not infallible)&quot;, while two years earlier they were &#8216;trustworthy&#8217;. (WT Aug. 15, 1968; <i>Life Everlasting</i>&#8230;) </p>
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; The basis of this gradual retraction was caused by Adam and Eve: what was the elapsed time between their dates of creation? The Society advanced the theory that they were created in the same year, after which God&#8217;s rest day began, thus legitimizing the parallelism-dogma. (WT May 1, 1968; Aug. 15, 1968; Aw Oct. 8, 1966; Oct. 8, 1968) Interestingly, after mentioning this event, the writer of the 1968 <i>Awake!</i>-article refers via a footnote to some pages in a 1963-publication, in which the topic is dismissed: </span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;No, for the creation of Adam does not correspond with the beginning of Jehovah&#8217;s rest day &#8230; It does no good to use Bible chronology for speculating on dates that are still future in the stream of time. Matth. 24:36.&quot;<sup>3</sup></span><sup><span lang="EN-GB"> </span></sup><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Awake!</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> of Oct. 8, 1968 was the last publication, which highlighted &#8216;1975&#8242; in a theologi­cal context. It&#8217;s true, that subsequent editions mentioned the &#8216;end of 6000 years of human history&#8217; to be imminent, (in 1979 this event was described as &#8216;approximately six years left&#8217;, WT May 1), but mainly non-Society, &#8216;Club of Rome Project&#8217;-like sources were quoted as support of a gloomy near future.<sup>4 </sup> Actually, <i>Awake!</i> of Oct. 8, 1971 implicitly dismisses &#8216;1975&#8242; as possible year of doom. In a diagram, &#8216;1975&#8242; is marked as an estimated date for world-wide famine and ecologi­cal collapse, but there&#8217;s more to come: from 1980 onward, the earth will be scourged by environmental pollution, to be followed in 1985 by oxygen deficiency. Also, a book published in 1973 is rather non-committal on &#8216;1975&#8242;: the end of 6000 years of man&#8217;s existence and the beginning of the seventh millennium will be reached many years prior to the year 2000.<sup>5</sup> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; " lang="EN-GB">If the premisses of the prophecy contain a definite <i>rational</i> character, <i>emotional</i> arguments completed the package. Probably as to neutralize the indefinite feature of the prediction, utterances of excitement, hope and urgency can be marked as the third distinction. &quot;The end is imminent&quot; are keywords intended to overrule possible doubts among the readers of the Society&#8217;s literature. &quot;What a time of big turmoil is ahead of us! A climax in man&#8217;s history is imminent!&quot;, and similar expressions accompany the (usual) cogently exegetic assertions. In some cases, this leads to a remarkable view on certain biblical passages. Consider the way, for example, how the Society tossed around with the crucial Mark and Matthew verses that &quot;concerning that day and hour nobody knows but only the Father&quot;:</span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;This is not the time to be toying with the words of Jesus (then follows Matt. 24:36. RS). To the contrary, it is a time when one should be keenly aware that the end of this system of things is rapidly coming to its violent end.&quot; (WT Aug. 15, 1968).</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;<br />
"> </span> </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">versus </span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;How close we may exactly be to the end of the present divisive system of things cannot be predicted, as Jesus reported that even he did not know the day or the hour &#8230; (Matt. 24:36).&quot; (WT May 1, 1970). </span> </p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Especially the monthly bulletin <i>Our Kingdom Ministry</i> (KM), intended for Jehovah&#8217;s witnesses only, used considerably less cautious language. As this periodical mainly contains proselytizing strategies, adherents were encouraged to increase their preaching activities, because time was running out rapidly:</span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;Less tha</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;">n hundred months separate us from the end of 6000 years of man&#8217;s history. What can YOU do in that time?.&quot; (KM Feb. 1968. Similar announcements appeared in the Sep. 1968, Mar. 1969 and Mar. 1972 Dutch editions)</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;">.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;"> Incentives for greater commitment were put on the stage, like a 87-year old Witness in New Zealand, who sold his business in 1914 in anticipation of the then prophesied cataclysm, &quot;so that he could enjoy a few months of &#8216;colportage&#8217; pioneer service.&quot; This person encourages young people to act in a similar way (WT Feb. 15, 1967). Obviously, the Society considers this a policy worth following:</span> </p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div class="Section1">
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;">&quot;Reports are heard of brothers selling their homes and property and planning to finish out the rest of their days in this old system in the pioneer service. Certainly this is a fine way to spend the short time remaining before the wicked world&#8217;s end.&quot; (KM May 1974, English ed., Dec. 1974 Dutch ed.).</span></p>
</p></div>
</blockquote>
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "></span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">In sum</span>, in the written sources of the Society, the &#8216;1975&#8242;-expectation emerges as an amalgam of a rational, exegetic construction and the emotional millennial prerogative of urgency, hope and action. As the year draws nearer, the biblical framework is less emphasized because of an uncertain variable, and the emotional argument, mainly fed by relevant, external references is more accentuated. <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The Society&#8217;s literature was one channel to disseminate the prophecy, the other was made up of lectures in congregations and during assemblies. The scanty data on what the Witnesses was told, also reveal a considerably less sophisticated view on the &#8216;1975&#8242;-events. During an assembly in 1974 the then Dutch branch-overseer tells the audience: </span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;">&quot;The youth has a bright future. Many of us suffered from misery, sickness and death. You don&#8217;t have to experience that any more. The new order is near. &#8230; There will be a very special Service Meeting (a weekly congregational gathering, RS) in the week of 8 September 1975. Invite everybody. And what will then happen? Well, we don&#8217;t tell. You think, that if Jehovah makes such an appeal, that there&#8217;s nothing unusual behind it? Yes? &#8230;Well, sell your house, sell everything you own and say oh boy, how long can I carry on with my private means. That long? Get rid of things! Pioneer! (more or less full-time proselytizing, RS). Plan to shower people with magazines during these last months of this dying system of things! Everybody you meet!&quot; (source: tape-recording, <i>Divine Purpose District Assembly</i>, Utrecht, Holland, Aug. 1974. Also cf. Penton 1985: 327, fn. 9).</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; The October 1, 1975 edition of <i>The Watchtower</i> explains why the final battle has not taken place. Sure enough, the time lapse between the creation of Adam and Eve proved to be the weak link in the prophecy. The Society, in earlier publications convinced that this period would be &quot;weeks or months, not years&quot;, had now substituted the word &#8216;not&#8217; by &#8216;or&#8217;, thus concluding that any speculation on that date does no good. Apparently, many Witnesses were not satisfied with the way the prophecy or rather the correction, had been proclaimed (cf. Penton 1985: 100). So the July 15, 1976 <i>Watchtower</i> came back to the issue and repeated the argument. Much more important, however, was the way in which the Society distanced itself from its earlier highly suggestive recommenda­tions to part with one&#8217;s possessions. The Witnesses themselves were to blame for their carelessness, for they had misread the bible. Since, the scriptures do not reveal a specific date: </span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;&#8230;it was not the world of God that failed or deceived him (i.e. the Witness) and brought disappointment, but &#8230; his own understanding was based on wrong premises.&quot;<br />
  </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:<br />
Arial;">It took the leading members of the Society four years, before they decided to acknowl­edge their error in the initial formulation of the prophecy (Franz 1985: 209). During the summer assemblies of 1979 the Society accepted the responsibility for a part of the disappointment among the adherents who felt victimized by the prophecy&#8217;s disconfirmation. The final word on the topic was stated in the WT March 15, 1980 edition in which utterances regarding &#8216;1975&#8242; were regretted. The case was closed.&nbsp; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; " lang="EN-GB">&nbsp; </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:<br />
Arial;">In January and February 1987, the Dutch branch of the Society offered a bargain of a package of nine, averaging 20-year old publications. The Witnesses were encouraged to distribute them as a &#8217;special book offer&#8217; during their house-to-house calls. Included was the book <i>Life Everlasting &#8211; in freedom of the Sons of God</i>, the first source of the prophecy. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Methodology</span></b></p>
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The major indication of a Jehovah&#8217;s Witness&#8217; commitment to his faith is his proselytizing activity. Extremely detailed, the Watchtower Society registers the missionary efforts of its adherents, publishing them annually and monthly. Generally, this information is considered reliable (Wilson 1978:183, Rogerson 1969:73, Stevenson 1967:18). </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The data presented here have been obtained from the annual editions of the <i>Yearbook of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses</i> and the monthly bulletin <i>Our Kingdom Ministry</i>.<sup>6</sup> The <i>Yearbook</i> contains a quantitative overview, indicating the Witnesses&#8217;s preaching activities in each country in which they are allowed to operate. It states, for example, the average number of &quot;publishers&quot;, i.e. those Witnesses who proselytize; growth or decline percentages of publishers compared to the previous year; amount of baptisms; average number of &quot;pioneers&quot;, i.e. those Witnesses spending at least 60 or 90 hours preaching monthly; the total number of hours spent on proselytizing, etcetera. </span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Our Kingdom Ministry</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> holds information of nation-wide proselytizing activity in terms of average individual monthly activity. Besides the amount of publishers and pioneers in a particular month, it states per individual the average number of preached hours; &quot;the back-calls&quot;, return visits to someone paying initial interest in the publisher&#8217;s message by purchasing a publication; the average number of &quot;bible-studies&quot;, which can be con­sidered as introductory courses for candidate members; the average amount of distributed magazines, and the like.<sup>7</sup> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The amount of publishers, the pioneer-publisher ratio, hours spent on proselytizing, back-calls and magazine-sales are applied as commitment indicators, both at the individ­ual and collective level. The first three indicators are essentially independent of public reception, while back-calls and magazine-sales are more contingent of interactional processes: a house dweller can refuse to purchase <i>Awake!</i>, the time it takes the Witness to persuade him to do so and to get the message over, is part of the proselytizing package. The output of these efforts are reflected in the baptismal figures. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The results are graphically represented in figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 is self-explanatory, figure 2 shows the indicators <i>per individual</i> publisher. It is important to stress the fact, that the Watchtower Society in its statistics shows proselytizing Witnesses only. Those, who for whatever reason do not participate in preaching activities, are omitted in the data. Figures showing a decrease of publishers may indicate marginalization, exclusion or defection. However, in view of the Society&#8217;s own definition of &#8216;Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses&#8217;, which includes the clause &quot;those who actively witness&quot;, the term &#8216;defection&#8217; will be applied to indicate declining membership.<sup>8</sup> Based on baptismal figures and amount of publishers, it is possible to estimate the magnitude of defection and, more specific, a &#8216;defection/recruitment ratio&#8217;, hereafter D/R-ratio. For example: in Holland during 1975 an average of 28,097 Witnesses were reported active. In the period 1976-&#8217;79 a total of 3,807 were baptized. Adding this amount to the 1975 figure and reducing it with the annual Dutch mortality rate (averaging 0.66%), 1979 should count 31,050 adherents. In fact, 26,040 were reported, giving a &#8217;shortage&#8217; of 5,010. So it is assumed that 16.1% dropped out, resulting in an average annual defection of 4%. Consequently, the D/R-ratio is 5,010/3,807 which equals 1,3. </p>
<p>&nbsp; Because of the effect of the 1975-prophecy on the proselytizing activities and membership quantities, it is important to distinguish four phases in the period 1961-1987. As will be shown, each of them is characterized by specific activities and distinctive growth and decline patterns. As the main sources for this analysis consist of quantitative overviews, the derived conclusions are highly tentative. Additional qualitative research, like in-depth interviewing of (former) Witnesses, is in progress. Also, comparative data from other regions will, no doubt, shed more light on this phenomenon. </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="49%" align="center"><b>FIGURE 1</p>
<p>        </b><u>ACTIVE WITNESSES, BAPTISMS AND PIONEERS</u><b><br />
        </b><br />
        <img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig1a.gif"/></p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig1b.gif"/></p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig1c.gif"/> </p>
</td>
<td width="2%">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="49%" align="center"><b>FIGURE 2</p>
<p>        </b><u>INDIVIDUAL PROSELYTIZING ACTIVITIES<br />
        </u><br />
        <img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig2a.gif"/></p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig2b.gif"/></p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig2c.gif"/> </p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><b>FIGURE 3</p>
<p>      </b><u>MONTHLY ACTIVITIES JUL 1974&nbsp; SEPT 1976</u><br />
      <img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/fig3.gif"/></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB">Of special interest as far as prophecy expectancy is concerned, is the summer-period of 1975 (see figure 3). According to the Society&#8217;s <i>Yearbook 1976</i> the maximum number of active Witnesses in Holland during 1975 amounted to 29.723. These were registered in November. In the monthly bulletin, however, a high point of 30,000 Witnesses was noted during the month of august. (KM Nov. 1975; Feb. 1976, Dutch ed.) Upon my query on this discrepancy, the Dutch branch office answered this was due to late reception of the data from the congregations. The number stated in the Yearbook was correct, not the one from the bulletin. It is interesting to speculate on this &#8216;late reception&#8217;. Procedure prescribes that publishers should file their activities on specially designed forms through their congregations at the end of each month. As the graph for july 1975 indicates, there is either a striking low activity in that month or activities were not reported. The first possibility seems unlikely, in view of the urgency of the epoch and the significant difference in activity between july and august. In this case the difference was an ample 12%, whereas the average amounted to 5%. But why this late filing, as asserted by the Society? Could it be that a more than average amount of Witnesses were absent so they were unable to file their reports? Did they perceive this was a last opportunity to enjoy a vacation within the secular institutions, previous to Armageddon would temporarily discontinue this pleasure?&nbsp; </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/></blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Proselytizing Activities 1961-1987</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">1. The <i>pre-prophecy</i> phase: 1961-1966 </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; As figure 1A shows, this period is characterized by a moderate increase of adherents. The annual average growth of active Witnesses amounts to 2,8%. The other commitment indicators are more or less stable: each Witness spends an average of 130 hours yearly on preaching, distributes approximately 110 magazines, makes 47 back-calls and almost 2,3% is active as a pioneer. Also, the baptismal figures do not show significant fluctu­ations: an average of almost 750 converts dedicate themselves yearly. The annual average defection amounts to 1,5%, the D/R-ratio is 0,29. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">2. The<i> prophecy</i> phase: 1967-1975 </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Highly significant is the rapid increase of all indicators from 1966 onward. Top scores in growth-rates of active Witnesses are made in 1968, 1971, 1973 and 1974 with 10,7%, 10,4%, 12,4% and 10,6% respectively. The so far unmatched amount of 29.723 Witnesses is reached in november 1975. In this possible autumn of doom, exactly 6000 years after the creation of Adam, the active following has more than doubled in less than ten years. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">&nbsp; <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">In the previous month more records are set: some 687,000 copies of <i>The Watchtower</i> and <i>Awake!</i> are distributed and almost 715.000 hours are spent in preaching. But these high points are not the result of the growing number of adherents only. The individual activity increases simultaneously, as figure 2 shows. The indicators back-calls and hours reach their maxima earlier than 1975. It is unclear what the cause of these &#8216;premature&#8217; commitment maxima is, but it might be that there exists a proselytizing-&#8217;ceiling&#8217;: after all, there is a physical limit in door-to-door preaching. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">Undoubtedly, the Society&#8217;s 1914-doctrine contributed to its growth during this period. This,&nbsp; still current, teaching assumes amongst others that &quot;before the last persons of the generation, alive in 1914 will pass away &#8230; this present wicked world will come to its end.&quot;<sup>9</sup>&nbsp; In view of the elapsed time, many new converts and dormant members must have considered this an extra impulse to join the Society&#8217;s ranks. (Botting 1984:63) </p>
</div>
<p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">According to the Society&#8217;s branch office in Holland, the introduction in 1968 of a new study aid for potential converts, was another major contribution to the increment. This book, called <i>The Truth that leads to Eternal Life</i> was used as an introductory course during home bible studies among those showing interest in the Society&#8217;s ideology. Important however, was the Society&#8217;s advise on this issue. After six months, the poten­tial convert should have visited the Kingdom Hall. If not, the study should be discon­tinued and conducted among those, &quot;who really want to know &#8216;The Truth&#8217; and are willing to make progress.&quot;<sup>10</sup> &nbsp;</span> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; " lang="EN-GB">&nbsp; Defection in this period is low. Some 1,8% leaves the Watchtower Society, while the D/R-ratio is extremely high in favor of the recruitment: 0,09. Strictly quantitatively spoken, this is not surprising in view of the baptismal figures: in this period 16,660 new Witnesses join the Society, amounting to an average of 1851 annually. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="left"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp;</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:<br />
Arial;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span> 3. The <i>disconfirmation</i> phase: 1976-1979 </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Obviously, many Witnesses believed that Armageddon might be postponed for a short while (the Society was rather explicit on that possibility), therefore 1976 doesn&#8217;t show a significant decrease in the amount of active members. Other commitment indicators however, had leveled off earlier. A definite diminishment of the Society&#8217;s following started in the summer of 1976, a process that would continue till 1980. It is estimated that in Holland approximately 5000 Witnesses either left the movement, were excluded or became marginal members, which amounts to 4% annual defection and a D/R-ratio of 1,32. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; The annual average baptismal figure drops to 952. This combination of baptisms and defectors may partially answer Wilson&#8217;s question, who, after mentioning the stagnation in growth of the Society&#8217;s global following in 1976, wonders if this is caused by a decrease of recruitment or defection (Wilson 1978:184). The Dutch case clearly points to both phenomena. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Illustrative for the total decline of proselytizing-activities are the figures in Table 1. It is clear, that all proselytizing aspects suffered a severe drawback, both at the individ­ual and collective level.&nbsp; </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><b><span lang="EN-GB">TABLE 1</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span>COLLECTIVE AND INDIVIDUAL PROSELYTIZING ACTIVITY&nbsp;<br />
  OF DUTCH JEHOVAH&#8217;S WITNESSES, 1975 VS. 1979</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
<div align="center">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:6.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "><br />
          Year</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:6.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; <br />
&nbsp; </span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">N</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:6.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">HOURS</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:6.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "><br />
          PIO</span></i> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:6.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">MAGS</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:6.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "></span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; "><i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
          B. -CALLS</i></span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">1975 1979 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">28,643 <br />
          26,103 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">5,759,100 3,853,324 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">2,093 <br />
          1,294 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">5,328,366 3,730,059 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">2,079,464 1,542,817 </span> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">decr </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-9% </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-33% </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-38% </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-30% </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-26% </span> </p>
<hr color="#100884"/>
      </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">1975 </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">1979 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">per ind </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">per ind </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">200.7 </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">147.6 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">186.0 </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">142.9 </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">72.6 </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">59.1 </span> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" height="20">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">decr </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" height="20">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" height="20">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-26.5% </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" height="20">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" height="20">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-23.2% </span> </p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" height="20">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;<br />
  "><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">-18.6% </span> </p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<hr color="#100884"/>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Note</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">: On the collective level, the data refer to total annual amounts <br />
  </span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Source</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;">: <i>Kingdom Ministry</i>, Dutch eds. 1975, 1979</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> &nbsp;</p>
<p>  </span></p>
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">4. The <i>post-prophecy</i> phase: 1980-1987 </span> </p>
</div>
<div class="Section2">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The 1980&#8217;s might be best characterized as a recovery from the traumatic disconfirmation phase. However, it seems that the more public dependent indicators as magazine distribution and back-calls experience a continuation of their decline. Probably the negative publicity in the Dutch media in 1982 and &#8216;83 has caused adverse societal susceptibility to the Society&#8217;s ideology, whereas the other indicators show a gradual increase. Still, individual commitment is remote from 1975. Comparing October 1975 and 1985, there is only 3% less active membership, but preached hours show a decrease of 28% and pioneer/publisher ratio of 30%. The defection amounts to 1,7 % annually, the D/R-ratio over the period is 0,49.<sup>11</sup> This means that of every two Witnesses being baptized, one is not actively engaged in proselytizing. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">Summarizing, it is obvious that the reaction of the Dutch Witnesses to the 1975-prophecy is one of initial hope, expectancy and tension. This is reflected in a growing commitment in terms of time-investment in proselytizing-activities: &quot;the more imminent Armageddon is conceived to be, the more urgent recruitment becomes.&quot; (Assimeng 1970:107)<br />
    However, being committed is one thing, a house-dweller accepting the message&nbsp; is another. Undoubtedly, the prophecy had a social breeding ground. Via its literature, the Society jumped on the bandwagon of the Club of Rome, which&nbsp; predicted a gloomy situation for the mid-seventies. Also, airplane hijackings and &#8216;Watergate&#8217; were perceived as definite omens.<sup>12</sup>&nbsp; Besides, the amalgam of social-cultural changes in the Dutch society of the late sixties and early seventies must have made a pessimistic impact on certain segments of the population concerning their perception on the enfolding of the near future. Rather adverse novel phenomena like drug-abuse and emerging unemploy­ment, plus the Society&#8217;s traditional topics like war, crime and other misery, made them susceptible to the prophecy and, gradually, to the complete ideological package. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Also, the Society operated on a highly competitive religious &#8216;market&#8217; (cf. Wallis 1987). To be sure, the essentials of the apocalyptic message were more or less the same as those propagated by many of the so-called New Religious Movements, a significant part of the doctrinal system however, was diametrically opposed to the counter-cultural ideas of the novel faiths. Though both the growth of the NRM&#8217;s and the Society functioned as a religious Dow-Jones index of social change, it may be hypothesized that the Society&#8217;s increase can partly be attributed to the NRM&#8217;s: did the latter cater to the needs of a &#8217;seeking youth&#8217; resisting petrified societal values, the former offered the &#8216;concerned citizen&#8217; ample ideological justification for his anxiety caused by the confrontation with deviant belief systems (cf. Bromley &amp; Shupe 1979: 85). </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">After 1975 the picture is totally reversed: decreasing activities, low recruitment and high defection. As far as this last concerns, it is interesting to note that other scholars publishing on the Watchtower Society, have neglected to relate defection to the prevail­ing doctrinal climate. So Beckford estimates 19% defection in England during the period 1963-&#8217;71. (Beckford 1975:65). Penton uses 20% for the world from 1967 through 1983. (Penton 1985:294). Franz&#8217; calculation adds up to a defection of &#8216;four out of ten persons baptized&#8217; in the period 1970-1979 (Franz 1985:31). Also, Beckford&#8217;s remarks on the growing drop-out rate of British Publishers since World War II and the recruitment/drop-out ratio of 3:1, can probably be more differentiated, if phase-specific analysis is applied. (Beckford 1977:22;1975:65). One might argue, that many religious movements reached their peak in this period. However, in Holland the decline in membership of the NRM&#8217;s did not start until the early eighties, thus eliminating this general trend as a variable causing the decrease of the Society&#8217;s missionary zeal right after &#8216;75. </span> </p>
</div>
<div class="Section3">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Discussion</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&quot;Do you know why nothing happened in 1975? Then, pointing at his audience, he shouted: &#8216;It was because YOU expected something to happen&#8217;.&quot;(Penton 1985:100). Thus said the Watchtower Society&#8217;s president to Canadian Witnesses during a speech held in 1976. This attitude of non-responsibility of the leading members towards the Witnesses as far as possible frustrations caused by the prophecy failure, was also exhaled in the Society&#8217;s initial publications. As distinct from the probability of a coalescence of the first 6000 years&#8217; termination of men&#8217;s history with the beginning of the millennium, this expectation was now flatly denied. Doctrinal changes were called for. It turned out, that Eve&#8217;s creation was the weak link in the prophecy&#8217;s starting-point: the 6000 years should have been counted from thàt date on. The scriptures, however, were not decisive when that event took place, as opposed to the 1966-results of the Society&#8217;s exegetic research. So it was impossible to construct a specific apocalyptic calendar. Failure had been expounded. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">The majority of the authors commenting on the Society&#8217;s prophecy failures agrees that the organization&#8217;s ability for reinterpreting foreseen events retrospectively is one of its most powerful means of survival (Beckford 1975; Brose 1982; Curry 1980; Penton 1985; Rogerson 1969; Whalen 1962; Zygmunt 1981). For, 1975 was not the first time: 1874, 1878, 1881, 1914, 1918 and 1925 had also been predestined for important events.<sup>13</sup>&nbsp; And every time there was occurrence of rise, fall and recovery. Often, the prediction was later said to have been fulfilled in the &#8216;invisible&#8217; world. But still, every time followers became disappointed and left the movement. White notes, that the Society had become careful as to mention another specific date after the considerable defections of the early twenties. (White 1968:399) Stevenson speculates on the fact, that the Society&#8217;s top was concerned about the growing apathy of the Witnesses and that the prophecy might &quot;rekindle zeal and devotion&quot; (Stevenson 1967:87). The Bottings believe in intentional manipulation as to increase membership (Botting &amp; Botting 1984:156), while, Zygmunt considers prophecy revelation a revitalization strategy (Zygmunt 1981:204). Franz, former member of the Society&#8217;s Brooklyn-elite, is not very clear on this issue. He only mentions the then vice-president as being the most convinced of the teaching. (Franz 1985:208) </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Also, it is remarked, that the 1975-prophecy has consciously been formulated rather ambiguously in order to prevent massive falling away in case of disconfirmation (Beckford 1975:220; Penton 1985:95). However, the ambiguity may not only have been important <i>after</i> disconfirmation-date, but also <i>during</i> the prophecy-phase. Consider for example the remarks of the anthropologist Schwartz, who, as a result of his study of Melanesian cargo-cults, notes that the function of proselytizing is not the reduction of dissonance, but instead that dissonance is <i>required</i> in order to maintain missionary activities: </span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;The function of much cult behaviour is not necessarily to lessen dissonance or to overcome ambivalence. Rather it is to assure a certain level of persisting ambivalence that sustains cult excitement and activity, which becomes an end in itself.&quot; (Schwartz 1976:189). </span>Following Schwartz, one may assert that the mere formulation of the 1975-prophecy may have caused considerable awkwardness among the Witnesses. Since, it was (and is) far beyond the Society&#8217;s doctrinal stance to disseminate diffuse exegesis. Doctrines used to be inflexible and legalistic, (which, to be sure, could be modified at a later date), so no confusion among the adherents could arise as how to interpret &#8216;The Truth&#8217;. But this rigidity was absent as far as the prophecy was concerned: the Society&#8217;s literature didn&#8217;t give an absolute hold, let alone what was said by some of the Society&#8217;s high-ranking officials. So it is likely, that dissonance-arousal occurred prior disconfirmation, contrib­uting to the increase of the missionary activities.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The indications on the preaching activities of the Dutch Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses after 1975 seem to depart from Festinger&#8217;s original hypothesis, that increased proselyting would occur following disconfirmation of a prediction (Festinger 1964:25). A review of the reaction of the adherents does raise some questions as to whether cognitive disson­ance theorizing is applicable in this specific situation. A recovery of preaching activities takes place in 1980, but only as far as the amount of publishers and pioneers concerns. Commitment in terms of time-investment continues to decline till 1984. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">Though several scholars on the Watchtower movement seem, to a more or lesser degree, to adhere to Festinger&#8217;s theory, since prophetic failure reactions are, in general terms, described as &quot;initial shocks followed by resumption and increase of proselytism&quot;, it is questionable whether this is due to renewed activity of &#8216;old&#8217; adherents. (See e.g. Curry 1980:182; Zygmunt 1981:202,216) Just as much there is case, that the increase of newly baptized from 1979 onward caused this revitalization, the more so, because defection in the beginning of the eighties, as well as in 1987, remains high.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The fact that the empirical evidence seems to contradict cognitive dissonance theoriz­ing, evokes alternative approaches. First, it is important to consider if the conditions, under which increased proselytizing occurs, are fulfilled (Festinger 1964:4): </span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> <br />
      </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">1. A belief must be held with deep conviction and it must have some relevance to action, that is, to what the believer does or how he behaves. </p>
<p>      2. The person holding the belief must have committed himself to it; that is, for the sake of his belief he must have taken some important action that is difficult to undo. </p>
<p>      3. The belief must be sufficiently specific and sufficiently concerned with the real world so that events may unequivocally refute the belief. </p>
<p>      4. Such undeniable disconfirmatory evidence must occur and must be recognized by the individual holding the belief &#8230;. </p>
<p>      </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;">5. The individual believer must have social support. It is unlikely that one isolated believer could withstand the kind of disconfirming evidence specified.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span> </p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="Section5">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "></span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; A</span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> first glance at these conditions results in a rather uneasy feeling. After all, how many witnesses were &#8216;deeply convinced&#8217; of the prophecy. how many &#8216;have com­mitted themselves&#8217; to it, in spite of Aronson&#8217;s remark that commitment is not a necessary condition for dissonance arousal (Aronson 1968: 466), what were &#8216;the actions taken by how many that were difficult to undo&#8217;, and, most of all, how &#8217;sufficiently specific&#8217; was the prophecy? These questions cast doubt on the applicability of Festinger&#8217;s theory, though there were Witnesses conforming to the conditions. Some reports, mainly based on the situation in the USA, mention the giving up of jobs, suspension of medical treatment, postponement of marriages and selling of property, but the magnitude of these actions is unknown (Brose 1982:157; Franz 1985:206; Penton 1985:95; Zygmunt 1977:56). Analysis of letters of former Witnesses, sent to a Dutch organization of disgruntled ex-adherents, reveals hardly any frustration directly related to &#8216;1975&#8242;, except for some isolated cases of people who borrowed large amounts of money in 1974, convinced that the apocalypse would salvage them from repayment. Considerably less dramatically was to abandon wallpapering the house, as one Witness was advised. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Most likely, the belief in the prophecy can best be represented like the bell-shaped curve of a normal distribution: at one extremity, the non-believers, convinced that nothing would occur; at the other side the true believers, who had no doubt. In between these minorities the bulk of adherents presented itself: they were not sure, but, just in case, they hedged their bets. Because the analysis is aimed at the majority of the Witnesses, not conforming to the conditions of Festinger&#8217;s theory, further references to the hypothesis don&#8217;t seem productive. However, an exception will be made for the fifth condition, isolating it from its context and emphasizing the in-group characteristics on the congregational level during the prophecy-phase. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; A significant revision of cognitive dissonance theory, put forward by Hardyck &amp; Braden, focuses on in-group cohesion and outsider&#8217;s reaction: </span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> <br />
      </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;the more social support an individual receives above the minimum he needs to maintain his belief, the less he will have to proselytize, . . . if a group is receiving considerable ridicule from non-members, one way of reducing dissonance that would be apparent to them would be to convince these &#8216;unbelievers&#8217; that the group is right.&quot; (Hardyck &amp; Braden 1962:140. See also Carroll 1979:95; Gager 1975:47) </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Starting with the second condition, there is no indication that the Dutch Witnesses were met with considerable outside ridicule after 1975. In any case, nothing was mentioned in the calvinistic oriented Dutch Reformed press, the movement&#8217;s most prominent ideological adversary. According to my informants some scornful remarks have been made during the door-to-door preaching, but this was a marginal phenomenon. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">The first condition mentioned by Hardyck &amp; Braden is much more significant. Being a Jehovah&#8217;s witness is more than a follower of a religious movement. It often means a way of life confined within the micro-cosmos of the congregation among fellow-believers. Social relationships have endogamous features, not in the least as a result of an indifferent or hostile environment. The society is aware of the immense importance of group-cohesion for the continuity of its operation. This message in the organization&#8217;s monthly bulletin expresses the danger of isolation: </span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> <br />
      </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;Removal can sometimes attend a big loss of contact with the congregation. Cases are known of brothers and sisters and persons showing interest, who got out of the routine completely after a removal and who lost their spiritual conviction almost completely.&quot; (KM june 1976, Dutch ed., my translation</span> </p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="Section6">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Group-cohesion is also being reinforced by excluding members, who challenge the Society&#8217;s ideological statements. At the end of the seventies many Witnesses were disfellowshipped, being accused of apostasy. Even the Society&#8217;s headquarters in New York turned out to be not immune for dissent. (Botting 1985:ch 7; Penton 1985:ch IV, 295ff; Franz 1985:ch 9; <i>Yearbook 1979</i>:23, 1980:11). No doubt, post-prophecy frustra­tions contributed to these insubordinate reactions of the Witnesses. Elimination of these elements is one of the organizational readjustments &quot;if the causes of prophetic failures are identified as internal to the movement itself.&quot; (Zygmunt 1972:261) </span> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">In-group socialization of new adherents entails both cognitive mastering of the Society&#8217;s ideology and affective incorporation into a new community. At least, this situation is conceivable in circumstances of a non-stirring doctrinal climate, implying a more or less stable amount of congregation members. However, during the four year period 1972-1975, in Holland almost 10,000 new adherents joined the organization, increasing the total amount with approximately 50%, while at the same time the number of congregations increased with only 15%. Apart from this quantitative momentum, which must have been a barrier for a thorough enculturation, there is also a qualitative dimension: &#8216;1975&#8242; as the main motive to join the movement. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">According to the Witnesses, that would have been an inadequate attitude towards &#8216;The Truth&#8217;. After all, there is a rather complicated ideology to be absorbed, of which, no doubt, the eschatological component is the most significant and it is highly questionable, if the newly baptized were completely familiar with the remainder of the Society&#8217;s teachings. So it seems unlikely, that the main part of the new members were fully integrated in the movement&#8217;s congregations because of the amount involved vs. the capacity of the organization to absorb them within a relatively short time, and the neophytes&#8217; focused ideological orientation. When disconfirmation occurred, the com­mitted were able to revert to the basic teachings of the Society, also supported by the group, which functioned as a defensive shield for the individual arousal of dissonance. (Beckford 1975: 221). It is likely, that for the newly baptized, those possibilities were lacking. Brose, quoting her informants, notes: </span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> <br />
    </span> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&quot;&#8230; those who left &#8230; were really opportunists. &#8230; they had postponed joining until a more convenient time. When the end appeared imminent &#8230; they became afraid and joined the group. When disconfirm­ation occurred, they had little investment in the group and found it easy to leave&quot;. (Brose 1982: 159, 160. Also cf. Wilson 1978:184). </span></p>
</blockquote>
<div class="Section6">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; The doctrinal aspect was clearly articulated by an elder, who, upon asking who left after 1975, answered: <br />
    </span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"> <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;">&quot;Those who left were the ones who were afraid of 1975. But they never were really in &#8216;The Truth&#8217;. Regarding this, it was good that Armageddon did not take place: &#8216;it separated the wheat from the chaff&#8217;&quot;. (fieldwork notes). &nbsp; <br />
      </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;">&nbsp; Besides the interesting phenomenon of the trial-function of prophecy disconfirmation as stipulated by the elder, these remarks confirm the observations of other scholars. So Balch et al., in their paper on a millennial Baha&#8217;i splinter faction, note the ability of the committed to readjust their belief to the basic issues of the Baha&#8217;i teachings, away from a prophecy failure (Balch et al. 1983:153). In their monograph on the Unification Church, Bromley and Shupe conclude similarly: </span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;[A]s long as the basic metaphor remains intact and a strong network of reinforcing social relationships is maintained, &#8230; changes in ideology do not necessarily pose a threat to the movement.&quot; (Bromley &amp; Shupe 1979:107). </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Finally Gager, commenting on the missionary attempts of the first Christians, notes: </span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;&#8230; the fact that the identity of individuals with the group as well as their breaking of old loyalties had long been established, suggests that the prophecy was less important to the members than the existence of the group itself.&quot; (Gager 1975:47. See also Carroll 1979:95).</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; Conclusion</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">&nbsp; It may be argued, that the increase in proselytizing activities of the Dutch Jehovah&#8217;s witnesses during the prophecy-phase in the period 1966-1975 has been caused by three factors. First, there was a favorable socio-cultural climate, in which a millennial, conservative message constituted a counterbalance against incipient and already prog­ressed societal changes as well as pessimistic expectations for the near future. Secondly, the adherents, both by the Society&#8217;s literature and by verbal statements of its officials, were continuously needled to intensify their preaching efforts, legitimized by the possibility of salvation in 1975. Third, the phraseology of the prophecy departed from the traditional rigid terminology, in the sense that the prophecy contained a definite uncertainty clause. This phenomenon may have caused a certain amount of dissonance among long-standing members, used as they were to the non-compromising language of the Society, resulting in increased missionary efforts.&nbsp; </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">&nbsp; <span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">It is hardly fruitful to apply Festinger&#8217;s cognitive dissonance theory to the events after 1975, because the pre-condi­tions accompanying the hypothesis are barely met. Preaching activities declined sharply and continued to do so in the Eighties. The organization&#8217;s ideological and infra-structural resources prevented significant losses on a macro-level, while on a micro-level group-cohesion was an effective barrier against dissonance arousal among the long-term adherents. Also, this category was able to revert to the basic issues of the Society&#8217;s teachings. Most probably, those forming part of the recruitment-bulge during the prophecy-phase, left the movement, because of a lack of proper sectarian resocialization, both socially and religiously.&nbsp; </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; " lang="EN-GB">&nbsp; The recovery from 1980 onward doesn&#8217;t seem related to Festinger&#8217;s theory. Individual time-investment in preaching activities continued to decline through 1983. Those, who left the movement after 1975, have been replaced by a new generation, most of them not aware of the &#8216;1975&#8242;-events and it is assumed, that this group is mainly responsible for the slight revitalization of the preaching activities. Also, no firm empirical evidence has so far been presented to establish a causal relationship between declining economic conditions and the Society&#8217;s recovery in the Eighties, as suggested by Botting and Botting (1984:184).&nbsp; </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size: 12.0pt; " lang="EN-GB">&nbsp; For whatever reasons people join the ranks of the Watchtower Society, the element of salvation from a world approaching unavoid­able doom, is still its most distinctive ideological feature. As so that, the Society is committed to another prophecy: the generation of 1914 will witness the end of this worldly system. Taking Schwartz&#8217;s cue, one may suggest that dissonance is maintained in order to activate proselytizing. Exactly how the &#8216;1914&#8242; generation and &#8216;the end&#8217; will be defined in the future, will become evident within one or two decennia. Perhaps in the way Whalen foresees: </span><span lang="EN-GB">&quot;By the year 2000 The Watchtower may be speaking about the invisible Armageddon that took place years before.&quot; (Whalen 1962:228).</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> Whatever the outcome, &quot;prophecies cannot and do not fail for the committed.&quot; (Weiser 1974:20). </span> </p>
</div>
<div class="Section8">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">Notes</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <i>Life Everlasting &#8211; in Freedom of the Sons of God</i>. WBTS, New York 1966. Dutch ed. 1968. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Some of the Society&#8217;s earlier publications deviated marginally from this year. The 1943-edition of <i>The Truth Shall Make You Free</i>, for example, mentions the year 4028 BC, while according to <i>New Heavens and a New Earth</i>(WBTS 1953) man was created around 4025 BC. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">3)<i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; All Scripture Is Inspired of God and Beneficial</i>. WBTS, New York 1963, Dutch ed. 1966 p.285. So at the same time, two opposite dogma&#8217;s were current. Note the time gap between the publication of the English and Dutch editions. In this period, the Dutch <i>Watchtower</i>, the Society&#8217;s main channel to disseminate doctrinal matters, appeared three months after the English edition, while <i>Awake!</i>, more accessible to non-members, was published six months later. Probably, as to prevent an ideological lead for the English-reading public, <i>The Watchtower</i> is published simultaneously in approximately 20 languages since 1985. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">4)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Frequent references were made to a book called <i>Famine-1975!</i>, in which world-wide catastrophe was predicted for the mid-seventies. For a critical review on the Society&#8217;s quotation-policy of secular sources, see Jonsson &amp; Herbst 1987. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">5)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <i>God&#8217;s Kingdom of a Thousand Years Has Approached</i>. WBTS, New York 1973, Dutch ed. p.12. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">6)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Society presents its annual statistics over the period september through august. With the exception of the baptismal figures, the data presented in this text are based on calendar years, derived from the monthly statistics in <i>Kingdom Ministry</i>. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">7)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; By multiplying the average individual amount by the number of Witnesses, the total amount has been obtained. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">8)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <i>Reasoning From the Scriptures</i>. WBTS, New York 1985 Dutch ed. p.216. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">9)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <i>Reasoning From The Scriptures, Dutch ed. p.89</i> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">10)&nbsp; &#8216;The Truth&#8217; is Witnesses&#8217; jargon, meaning the Society&#8217;s belief system. See KM Nov.1968, Dutch ed. and Penton 1985:95. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">11)&nbsp; This figure gets more relief, if the annual ratios are given: 1980:0.65 1981:0.63 &#8211; 1982:0.47 &#8211; 1983:0.49 &#8211; 1984:0.48 &#8211; 1985:0.34 &#8211; 1986:0.28 &#8211; 1987:0.68 </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">12)&nbsp; As stated by several high-ranking officials of the Dutch branch in news-paper interviews. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">13)&nbsp; See Curry 1980:ch.V. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&nbsp; </span> <b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;">References</span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.5pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; "> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Aronson, E. (1968) &quot;Discussion: Commitments about Commitments,&quot; pp. 464-466 in: Abelson, R.P. et al. eds. <i>Theories of Cognitive Consistency. A Sourcebook</i>. Chicago: Rand McNally. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Assimeng, J.M. (1970) &quot;Sectarian Allegiance and Political Authority: The Watch Tower Society in Zambia, 1907-1935.&quot; <i>Journal of Modern African Studies</i> 8(1)97-112. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Balch, R.W. et al. </span>(1983) &quot;When the bombs drop: Reactions to Disconfirmed Prophecy in a Millennial Sect.&quot;&nbsp; <i>Sociological Perspectives</i> 26(2)137-158. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Beckford, J.A. (1975) <i>The Trumpet of Prophecy. A sociological study of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses.</i> London: Basil Blackwell. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">­&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472; (1977) &quot;The Watchtower Movement World-Wide.&quot; <i>Social Compass</i> 24(1)5-31. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Botting, H. &amp; G. (1984) <i>The Orwellian World of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses.</i> Toronto: University of Toronto Press. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Bromley, David G. &amp; Anson D. Shupe. (1979) <i>&#8216;Moonies&#8217; in America.</i> Beverly Hills Sage Publications. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Brose, A.J. (1982) <i>Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses: Recruitment and Enculturation in a Millennial Sect.</i> Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Calif., Ann Arbor: UMI </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Carroll, R.P. (1979) <i>When Prophecy Failed. Reactions and Responses to failure in the Old Testament Prophetic Traditions.</i> London: SCM-press. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Curry, M.D. (1980) <i>Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses: The Effects of Millenarianism on the maintenance of a religious sect.</i> Ph.D. diss. Florida State Univ., Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Festinger, L. et al. </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">(1964) <i>When Prophecy Fails.</i> New York: Harper &amp; Row. (orig. 1956) </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Franz, R. (1985) <i>Crises of Conscience.</i> Atlanta: Commentary Press. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Gager, J.G. (1975) <i>Kingdom and Community. The Social World of early Christianity.</i> Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. </span> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">Hardyck, J.A. &amp; M. Braden. (1962) &quot;Prophecy fails again: A report of a failure to replicate.&quot;&nbsp; <i>Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology</i> 65(2):136-141. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Jonsson, C.A. &amp; W. Herbst. (1987) <i>The &quot;Sign&quot; of the Last Days &#8211; When?</i> Atlanta: Commentary Press. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Penton, M.J. (1985) <i>Apocalypse Delayed. The Story of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses.</i> Toronto: University of Toronto Press. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Rogerson, A.T. (1969) <i>Millions Now Living Will Never Die.</i> London: Constable. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Schwartz, Th. (1976) &quot;The cargo-cult: a Melanesian type response to change,&quot; pp. 157-206 in De Vos, G.A. ed. <i>Responses to change. Society, culture and personality.</i> New York: Van Nostrand. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Stevenson, W.C. (1967) <i>Year of Doom, 1975. The Story of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses.</i> London: Hutchinson (Also published as: <i>The Inside Story of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses.</i> New York: Hart Publishing 1968). </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Wallis, Roy. (1987) &quot;New Religions and the Potential for World Re-enchantment: Religion as Way of Life, Preference and Commodity,&quot; pp 87-98 in <i>Secularization and Religion: The Persisting Tension.</i> Acts of the XIXth ICSR, Tübingen 1987. Lausanne: CISR. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Weiser, Neil. (1974) &quot;The Effects of Prophetic Disconfirmation of the Committed.&quot; <i>Review of Religious Research</i> 16(1)19-30. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Whalen, W.J. (1962) <i>Armageddon around the Corner.</i> New York: John Day. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">White, T. (1967) <i>A People for His Name. A History of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses and an evaluation.</i> New York: Vantage Press. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Wilson, B. (1978) &quot;When Prophecy Failed.&quot; <i>New Society </i>25 January. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">Zygmunt, J.F. (1972) &quot;When Prophecies Fail.&quot; <i>American Behavioral Scientist</i> 16 (2)245-267. </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (1977) Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses in the USA: 1942-1976.&quot; <i>Social Compass</i> 24(1) 45-47. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; ">&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472;&#9472; (1981) &quot;Prophetic Failure and Chiliastic Identity: the case of Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses,&quot; pp. 195-220 in Jansma L.G. &amp; P. Schulten eds. <i>Religieuze Bewegingen.</i> The Hague: Mouton [orig. in <i>American Journal of Sociology</i> 1970(76)926-948]</span><font color="#000000"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; "></span></font><font color="#000000"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; "></span></font><font color="#000000"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; "></span></font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="#000000"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; "><br />
                  </span></font><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.5pt; "> </span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 12.0pt; ">© Richard Singelenberg. May not be reprinted without permission.</span></i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/the-1975-prophecy-and-its-impact-among-dutch-jehovahs-witnesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peace and Security</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/peace-and-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/peace-and-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rado Vleugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Carl Olof Jonsson 
(From: Investigator No. 30 1993 May)
              &#160; 
To apocalyptic movements the “end” has always been at hand. Without doubt this has been the key to their success.&#160; How many people wouldn’t like our world of endless problems to disappear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--show=single-->
<p align="center"><b>Carl Olof Jonsson </b></p>
<p align="center">(From: Investigator No. 30 1993 May)<br />
              &nbsp; </p>
<p><!--/show-->To apocalyptic movements the “end” has always been at hand. Without doubt this has been the key to their success.&nbsp; How many people wouldn’t like our world of endless problems to disappear and be replaced by a better one?&nbsp; Any movement that is able to keep such expectations alive has a guaranteed increase. <span id="more-49"></span><br />
              &nbsp;</p>
<p align="left"><b>War and Peace as “Signs of the Times”</b> </p>
<p align="left">Such expectations are created by interpreting different<br />
              world events as prophetic ‘signs’, which indicate that the end is<br />
              close.&nbsp; There are always Scriptures which, by the aid of a<br />
              little imagination, can be applied to the current world situation.<br />
              In times of war Jesus’ words about “nation against nation and kingdom<br />
              against kingdom” (Matt. 24:7) are quoted.&nbsp; And during more<br />
              peaceful periods attention is drawn to other biblical statements.&nbsp;<br />
              At such times the Watch Tower Society has commonly referred to the<br />
              words of the apostle Paul at 1 Thessalonians 5:3. This text says,<br />
              according to the <i>New World Translation</i>: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“Whenever it is that they are saying: ‘Peace and security!’<br />
                  then sudden destruction is to be instantly upon them just as<br />
                  the pang of distress upon a pregnant woman; and they will by<br />
                  no means escape.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Society interprets this text as follows, according to <i>The<br />
                Watchtower</i> of May 15, 1984,&nbsp; page 6: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“This prophecy makes it clear that, just prior to the end of<br />
                  this system of things, ‘peace and security’ will be declared<br />
                  in some exceptional way, whether by the United Nations or independently<br />
                  by political and religious leaders.&nbsp; What will follow that<br />
                  declaration?&nbsp; Paul said: ‘Then sudden destruction will<br />
                  be instantly upon them.’—1 Thessalonians 5:2, 3”</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>An “Unmistakable Sign”?</b> </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left">Seventy-six years have now passed since 1914, when,<br />
              according to the Society, the ‘last generation’ began. That the<br />
              present peace efforts have heightened the expectations among Jehovah’s<br />
              Witnesses is, therefore, nothing to wonder at. </p>
<p align="left">Thanks to Gorbachev’s ‘glasnost’ policy a new period<br />
              of relaxation between the great powers has developed. A number of<br />
              protracted wars have ended, the dictatorships in Eastern Europe<br />
              are falling, and important steps have been taken in the negotiations<br />
              on peace and disarmament.&nbsp; Will this development result in<br />
              a proclamation of “Peace and Security” around the world?&nbsp; This<br />
              is, at least, what Jehovah’s Witnesses are now being led to look<br />
              for. </p>
<p align="left">According to the Society, such a proclamation will<br />
              be “the signal for God to move into action”, yes, “an unmistakable<br />
              signal that world destruction is imminent.” &#8211; <i>Awake!</i>, April<br />
              8; 1988, page 14;&nbsp; “True Peace and Security &#8211; How Can You Find<br />
              It?” (1986), page 85. </p>
<p align="left">But how “unmistakable,” really, is the “signal” the<br />
              Witnesses have been told to look for? Most of them are completely<br />
              unaware of the fact that the Society repeatedly during its past<br />
              history has proclaimed that the period of&nbsp; “peace and security”<br />
              is immediately at hand, or even that this period already has begun.&nbsp;<br />
              Each time, however, the “unmistakable signal” has turned out to<br />
              be a mistake! <br />
              &nbsp; </p>
<p align="left"><b>“Peace and Security” in the Period 1899-1914</b>
            </p>
<p align="left">Towards the end of his life Charles Taze Russell,<br />
              the first president of the Watch Tower Society, arrived at the conclusion<br />
              that 1 Thessalonians 5:3 was fulfilled in the period 1899-1914.&nbsp;<br />
              When, during a question and answer session at a convention in 1915,<br />
              he was asked how this text should be understood, he answered: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“We think that this saying of&nbsp; ‘peace! peace!’ has been<br />
                  going on for some years.&nbsp; The Church systems and everybody<br />
                  have been claiming, ever since the first Peace Conference at<br />
                  The Hague (in 1899), that war had to come to an end, that we<br />
                  were having the time of peace that the Bible tells us about.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to Russell’s interpretation, this period of “peace<br />
                and security” was cut off in 1914 by the “great tribulation”,<br />
                which was to culminate in the predicted world destruction. &#8211; See<br />
                the book: <i>What Pastor Russell Said</i> (written by L. W. Jones,<br />
                a close associate of Pastor Russell), page 529 <br />
                &nbsp; </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><b>Peace and Security in 1918</b> </p>
<p align="left">Russell’s interpretation turned out to be shortlived.<br />
              In 1917, when world developments indicated that the war, instead<br />
              of culminating in world destruction, would soon come to an end,<br />
              Russell’s interpretation was changed by the new president, J. F.<br />
              Rutherford. The war would end, he wrote, and be followed by “a short<br />
              period of peace,” when the people would say “Peace” in accordance<br />
              with 1 Thess. 5:3.&nbsp; Soon after that the end would come. &#8211; <i>The<br />
              Watch Tower</i>, Jan. l, 1917, pp. 4-5;&nbsp; Dec.1, 1917, p. 358<br />
              <br />
              &nbsp; </p>
<p align="left"><b>“Peace and Security” in the 1930s</b> </p>
<p align="left">The “sudden destruction” expected to follow quickly<br />
              upon the peace that commenced in 1918 turned out to be long in coming.&nbsp;<br />
              In the middle of the 1930s, therefore, the time was due for a new<br />
              application of the ‘peace prophecy’.&nbsp; Thus, in 1936, Rutherford,<br />
              in the booklet <i>Choosing Riches or Ruin?</i>, wrote that they<br />
              “now” were in the period when the prophetic words in 1 These. 5:3<br />
              would be fulfilled. But prior to this imminent peace period, Rutherford<br />
              predicted, the nations on earth, headed by religious leaders, would<br />
              silence the preaching work of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Thereafter they<br />
              would proclaim “Peace and security” worldwide. &#8211; See also pages<br />
              291-294 of the book <i>Enemies</i>, published in 1937.&nbsp; On<br />
              page 293 of the latter book Rutherford wrote: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“The old ‘whore’ (Roman Catholic Church) sitting upon the back<br />
                  of the beast may soon be expected to say: ‘Peace and safety;<br />
                  we have silenced all opponents.’&nbsp; Then Jehovah’s ‘strange<br />
                  act’ will begin, and sudden destruction comes upon her ‘as travail<br />
                  upon a woman with child’.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>“Peace and Security” After 1945</b> </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left">In 1939, however, World War II broke out without having<br />
              been preceded by the predicted world peace.&nbsp; Once again, therefore,<br />
              Rutherford had to postpone the peace period. In 1940 he foretold<br />
              that the war would soon be interrupted by a brief peace period,<br />
              immediately followed by God’s war Armageddon. &#8211; <i>The Watchtower</i><br />
              August 15, 1940, page 246 and September 1, 1940, pp. 259, 260, 265,<br />
              266. </p>
<p align="left">Early in 1942, in the middle of the war, Rutherford<br />
              died.&nbsp; His successor, N. H. Knorr, stuck to this latest interpretation.&nbsp;<br />
              In the booklet <i>Peace &#8211; Can It Last?</i>, published in 1942, Knorr<br />
              explained that the peace period soon to come “will be very short-lived”,<br />
              as it would quickly be followed by the battle of Armageddon. (Page<br />
              26) </p>
<p align="left">But the peace period that began after the end of the<br />
              war in 1945 was not to become as “short-lived” as the Watch Tower<br />
              Society had predicted!&nbsp; We are, in fact, still living in that<br />
              peace period!&nbsp;&nbsp; Historians now point out that such a long<br />
              era of peace between the great powers is unique in history!&nbsp;<br />
              Historian Robert Jarvis, for instance, wrote in 1988 that, </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“Such a long period of peace between the mightiest states is<br />
                  without precedence.” (International Security, Vol. 13 1988,<br />
                  p. 80)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And two years earlier K. J. Holsti noted that, </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“By historical standards a forty-one year period without an<br />
                  intra-Great Power war is unprecedented.” (International Studies<br />
                  Quarterly, 30 December 1986, p. 369)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This peace period has now lasted over 45 years <br />
                &nbsp; </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><b>“Peace and Security”&nbsp; in the 1970s</b> </p>
<p align="left">During the greater part of the peace period after<br />
              1945 the relations between the great powers have been strained,<br />
              a situation that has often been described as ‘the cold war.’ The<br />
              ‘peace prophecy’ at 1 Thess. 5:3, therefore, was generally pushed<br />
              into the background. But early in the 1970s a relaxation, a detente,<br />
              of the strained relations occurred.&nbsp; This was greeted in the<br />
              Watchtower publication as an important “sign”, especially as the<br />
              Society for a number of years had been stressing that 6,000 years<br />
              since the creation of Adam would expire in 1975.&nbsp; “Strange<br />
              events are taking place in our time,” said the Awake! magazine of<br />
              October 8, 1972., on page 4.&nbsp; This special issue on the theme<br />
              “World Peace Coming &#8211; Will it Last?” contained a series of articles<br />
              discussing the peace efforts.&nbsp; On page 9 the magazine referred<br />
              to the prophecy about “Peace and Security” at 1 Thessalonians 5:3<br />
              and stated: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“This prophecy seems to be rapidly nearing its fulfillment.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Two books, both published in 1973, added more fuel to the expectations.<br />
                <i>True Peace and Security &#8211; From What Source?</i>&nbsp; clearly<br />
                related the detente in the world to the prophecy at 1 Thess. 5:3.&nbsp;<br />
                And the other book, <i>God’s Kingdom of a Thousand Years Has Approached</i>,<br />
                said on page 364: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“The current world events appear to be flowing toward the situation<br />
                  when men in control of affairs will jubilantly cry out in a<br />
                  self-congratulating way: ‘Peace and security!’”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Similar statements appeared repeatedly in the Watchtower publications<br />
                during the next two years. <br />
                &nbsp; </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><b>1986: “The International Year of Peace”</b> </p>
<p align="left">Despite all the predictions and expectations for the<br />
              1970s, the decade passed without either world peace or world destruction.<br />
              And when also the relaxation and peace talks between the great powers<br />
              broke down, <i>The Watchtower</i> finally had to admit that “none<br />
              of these efforts fit the description at 1 Thessalonians 5:2, 3.”<br />
              (The Watchtower, November 15, 1981, p. 14) </p>
<p align="left">But toward the end of 1985 the speculations got a<br />
              new start.&nbsp; On October 24, 1985, the United Nations, on its<br />
              40th anniversary, declared 1986 as “the International Year of Peace”.
            </p>
<p align="left"><i>The Watchtower</i> of October 1, 1985, stated that<br />
              Jehovah’s Witnesses “watch the event with interest”, but “cannot<br />
              say in advance whether this will prove to be the fulfilment of Paul’s<br />
              words quoted above.” (Page 18)&nbsp; For safety’s sake, however,<br />
              The Society dusted off one of the books from 1973, <i>True Peace<br />
              and Security—From What Source?</i>&nbsp; and published it again<br />
              in a new, revised edition during the peace year 1986 (renamed as<br />
              True Peace and Security—How Can You Find It?).&nbsp; Referring to<br />
              the United Nations declaration of 1986 as the “Year of Peace”, the<br />
              book quoted the prophecy at 1 Thess. 5:3 and stated that: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“this, no doubt, is a step toward the fulfilment of Paul’s<br />
                  above-quoted words.” (Page 85)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Like all the earlier predictions and expectations, the “peace<br />
                year” 1986, too, failed to “signal the imminent apocalypse.” (The<br />
                Watchtower, February, 1986, page 6)&nbsp; The developments in<br />
                recent years, however, during our present so-called “glasnost”<br />
                era, have kept the expectations alive. At first, though, the statements<br />
                in the Watchtower publications were framed somewhat more cautiously.<br />
                One hundred years of failed predictions seemed to have left their<br />
                marks. In <i>Awake!</i> magazine of December 8, 1989, the question<br />
                was asked if the recent surprising world events could be a fulfilment<br />
                of 1 Thess. 5:3. The answer given was: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“We cannot say. Nevertheless, it is obvious that today, in<br />
                  December 1989,&nbsp; ‘peace and security’ is closer to realization<br />
                  than before.” (page 24)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The issues of <i>The Watchtower</i> of April 1 and 15, 1990,<br />
                both carried special articles on “world peace”, but still one<br />
                could notice a palpable caution.&nbsp; The April 1 issue just<br />
                briefly mentioned that 1 Thessalonians 5:3 will be fulfilled “very<br />
                soon” (page 9), while the issue of April 15 didn’t mention Paul’s<br />
                prophecy at all. </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left">This caution turned out to be short-lived. A few months<br />
              later, at the Society&#8217;s summer conventions a new book, <i>Mankind’s<br />
              Search For God</i>, was released.&nbsp; On page 371 of this book<br />
              we found the following bold statement </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“Already, another outstanding Bible prophecy is approaching<br />
                  fulfillment before our eyes.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Then, quoting Paul’s words at 1 Thess. 5:1-3, the Society applies<br />
                them to the present world situation by saying it would appear<br />
                that the nations that were formerly belligerent and suspicious<br />
                of one another are now moving cautiously to-ward a situation in<br />
                which they will be able to declare world peace and security. New<br />
                expectations are thus, once again, being built up among the Witnesses<br />
                worldwide. In view of the past record, it seems safe to predict<br />
                that these expectations also will fail. <br />
                &nbsp; </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><b>“Timely Warnings to the Reading Public”?</b> </p>
<p align="left">Time and again, for almost a whole century, the Watch<br />
              Tower society has proclaimed that Paul’s prophecy about “peace and<br />
              security” has been close to fulfillment. Each time these predictions<br />
              have gone wrong.&nbsp; It might be expected that a movement that<br />
              has failed so com-pletely in its predictions would finally assume<br />
              a more humble attitude and begin to tone down its prophetic claims.<br />
              But instead the movement continues, with stubborn presumptuousness,<br />
              to speak as if it receives its messages directly from Jehovah himself:&nbsp;<br />
              “We are confident that Jehovah will keep his people well informed”,<br />
              said <i>The Watchtower</i> of May 15, 1987 (page 19)&nbsp; And in<br />
              the same magazine, in the issue of September 1, 1987, the following<br />
              promise is given on page 22: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“To help you keep on guard, the Watch Tower Society will continue<br />
                  issuing in its publications timely warnings to the reading public,<br />
                  so that you will not be caught off guard by the coming pretentious<br />
                  proclamation&nbsp; ‘Peace and security’, as devised by the nations<br />
                  of this old system of things.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>“Timely warnings”?&nbsp; How much is such a promise worth to<br />
                the one who knows that every warning of this kind given in the<br />
                past by this Society has been given in the wrong time?&nbsp; Not<br />
                a scrap, of course. Unfortunately, however, millions of unsuspecting<br />
                and confiding people will continue to take such promises in sober<br />
                earnest and act accordingly.&nbsp; No one is so misled as the<br />
                one who believes it is a grave sin to question those who misled<br />
                him. (Matthew 15:14) <br />
                &nbsp; </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><b>What Did the Apostle Mean?</b> </p>
<p align="left">Did Paul really predict that the nations, immediately<br />
              before the end of the age, would proclaim a world peace?&nbsp; Did<br />
              he say that this would be the “final signal” heralding that&nbsp;<br />
              “sudden destruction” is imminent? (The Watchtower, May 15, 1987,<br />
              page 19) The context, and especially the broader context, shows<br />
              this conclusion to be totally wrong. </p>
<p align="left">Bible commentators often point out that the apostle<br />
              Paul in 1 Thess. 5:1-11 simply gives a summary of Jesus’ own words<br />
              about his coming as recorded at Matt. 24:36-44, Luke 17:26-30 and<br />
              21:34-36.&nbsp; Jesus had said that he would come unexpectedly,<br />
              like a thief in the night.&nbsp; It would be as in the days of Noah,<br />
              before the Flood, and as in the days of Lot, before the destruction<br />
              of Sodom and Gomorrah.&nbsp; People back then were occupied with<br />
              their daily activities and didn’t suspect anything; “they were eating<br />
              and drinking, men were selling, they were planning, they were building.”<br />
              In the middle of all this the destruction suddenly came upon them.&nbsp;<br />
              Paul briefly sums up Jesus’ words: </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“Now, brothers, about times and dates we do not need to write<br />
                  to you, for you know very well (from Jesus’ own words) that<br />
                  the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. While<br />
                  people are saying, ‘Peace and safety,’ destruction will come<br />
                  on them suddenly.” 1 Thessalonians 5.1-3 New International Version</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A thief does not announce in advance the “times and dates” of<br />
                his coming.&nbsp; He does not “signal” his coming in any way.&nbsp;<br />
                He comes unexpectedly, surprisingly, when people feel safe and<br />
                secure.&nbsp; It was because of this absence of any “signs” or<br />
                “signals” that Jesus urged his disciples to “keep awake” and “ready”<br />
                and “sober”. (Matt. 24:42, 44; Luke 21:34, 36)&nbsp; Paul repeated<br />
                these exhortations. (1 Thess. 5:6-8)&nbsp; To “keep awake” would<br />
                not mean to keep looking for any “final signal”, but to “keep<br />
                our senses and have on the breastplate of faith and love and as<br />
                a helmet the hope of salvation”. (1 Thess. 5:8)&nbsp; The one<br />
                clothed in that armor would not be taken by surprise by the “Lord’s<br />
                day”.&nbsp; He would be ready, whenever it came. </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left">The Watch Tower Society has changed the sense of Paul’s<br />
              words to mean exactly the reverse. They have made the predicted<br />
              absence of “signs” and “signals”, which Paul expressed with the<br />
              words “Peace and safety” (NW: “Peace and security”)&nbsp; to the&nbsp;<br />
              “final signal”&nbsp; that world destruction is imminent! </p>
<p align="left"><b>“Peace, Peace; When There Is No Peace”</b> </p>
<p align="left">The Greek word used by Paul of “peace” is “eirene”.<br />
              This word is used in the New Testament as an equivalent of the Hebrew<br />
              word “schalom”, which often occurs in the Old Testament.&nbsp; Schalom<br />
              did not merely refer to “peace” in the political sense, but also,<br />
              and primarily, to God’s good will toward men, “God’s peace”.&nbsp;<br />
              Paul’s use of the expression “Peace&nbsp; (eirene) and safety” is<br />
              commonly supposed to be an allusion to Jeremiah’s words about the<br />
              Jews of his time at Jer. 5:14 and 8:11 (ASV): </p>
<div align="left">
<blockquote>
<p>“They have healed also the hurt of my people slightly, saying,<br />
                  Peace, peace; when there is no peace.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There was no political peace at that time The Babylonian king<br />
                Nebuchadnezzar was involved in a campaign of conquests aimed at<br />
                subduing the whole Middle East, and Judah, too, was threatened.&nbsp;<br />
                But the people felt safe, imagining that they had God’s protection,<br />
                His “peace”. They expected “no evil” to “come upon” them. (Jer.<br />
                23:17) The destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in 587 B.C.,<br />
                therefore came as a shocking surprise. </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left">This too indicates that Paul’s words about “Peace<br />
              and Safety” should not be understood as a political proclamation<br />
              of world peace, interpreted as the “final signal&#8221; of &#8220;world<br />
              destruction&#8221;. </p>
<p align="center">BOOK TIP <br />
              <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0914675095/watchtowerinform"><img border="0" src="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/sld.gif" width="68" height="100"/><br />
              Sign of the Last Days When<br />
              </a>by Carl O. Johnsson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/dates/peace-and-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
