<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gentile Times Reconsidered -by Carl Olof Jonsson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:24:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gail Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-66030</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-66030</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-719&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@607 &lt;/a&gt; 
What you really need to calculate is the length of the reign of the Babylonian kings in relation to 539 being the definite and indisputable date for the Medes and Persians conquering Babylon. This is one of the few absolute dates upon which we all agree., regardless of the 70 years captivity. And the Scriptures assure us that the land was never wholly desolate anyway. 2 Kings 24;14, 2 Kings 25;12 If you start at 587 BC and add on the length of each of the kingsâ€™ reigns, you get the picture, with no reference needed to any other source but the Bible. 539 + 17 years for Nabonidus = 556 BC 556 + 9 months for Labashi Marduk = 557 BC 557 + 4 years for Neriglissar = 561 BC 561 + 2 years for Evil Merodach = 563 BC 563 + 43 Years for Nebuchadnezzar = 606 BC Therefore Nebuchadnezzar began to reign in 606 BC and in his 19th year he besieged Jerusalem for the first time making that 586 BC. So you see it matters not whether the land was totally empty for 70 years or not, the reigns of the kings make the dates unmistakable, based on a date upon which everyone agrees, namely the date the Medes and Persians overthrew Jerusalem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-719" rel="nofollow">@607 </a><br />
What you really need to calculate is the length of the reign of the Babylonian kings in relation to 539 being the definite and indisputable date for the Medes and Persians conquering Babylon. This is one of the few absolute dates upon which we all agree., regardless of the 70 years captivity. And the Scriptures assure us that the land was never wholly desolate anyway. 2 Kings 24;14, 2 Kings 25;12 If you start at 587 BC and add on the length of each of the kingsâ€™ reigns, you get the picture, with no reference needed to any other source but the Bible. 539 + 17 years for Nabonidus = 556 BC 556 + 9 months for Labashi Marduk = 557 BC 557 + 4 years for Neriglissar = 561 BC 561 + 2 years for Evil Merodach = 563 BC 563 + 43 Years for Nebuchadnezzar = 606 BC Therefore Nebuchadnezzar began to reign in 606 BC and in his 19th year he besieged Jerusalem for the first time making that 586 BC. So you see it matters not whether the land was totally empty for 70 years or not, the reigns of the kings make the dates unmistakable, based on a date upon which everyone agrees, namely the date the Medes and Persians overthrew Jerusalem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-61929</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-61929</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8047&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Todd Gaylor &lt;/a&gt; 

The so-called Gentile Times or more accurately &#039;the appointed times of the nations&#039; were only 42 months. Jesus said that the literal city of Jerusalem would be trample on by the nations for an appointed time -- not God&#039;s rulership as the Watchtower mistakenly believes. Read Luke chapters 17 - 21 for proof of this. The Watchtower is guilty of misleading millions regarding this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8047" rel="nofollow">@Todd Gaylor </a> </p>
<p>The so-called Gentile Times or more accurately &#8216;the appointed times of the nations&#8217; were only 42 months. Jesus said that the literal city of Jerusalem would be trample on by the nations for an appointed time &#8212; not God&#8217;s rulership as the Watchtower mistakenly believes. Read Luke chapters 17 &#8211; 21 for proof of this. The Watchtower is guilty of misleading millions regarding this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-39065</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 03:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-39065</guid>
		<description>Is there  a free download of this book?
My Email is michellefromwisconsin @yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there  a free download of this book?<br />
My Email is michellefromwisconsin @yahoo.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard E</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-8082</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8067&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Todd Gaylor &lt;/a&gt; No thanks man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8067" rel="nofollow">@Todd Gaylor </a> No thanks man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Gaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-8067</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Gaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-8067</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-8064&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8064&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard E &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8047&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Todd Gaylor &lt;/A&gt;Dear Todd, I read this book long time ago and I have to say it’s well written and can deepen your understanding of this subject. But it’s a bloody 360 pages long!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank You Richard- It just might be worth buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-8064"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-8064" rel="nofollow">Richard E </a> :</strong><a href="#comment-8047" rel="nofollow">@Todd Gaylor </a>Dear Todd, I read this book long time ago and I have to say it’s well written and can deepen your understanding of this subject. But it’s a bloody 360 pages long!</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank You Richard- It just might be worth buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard E</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-8064</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-8064</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8047&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Todd Gaylor &lt;/a&gt; 
Dear Todd, I read this book long time ago and I have to say it&#039;s well written and can deepen your understanding of this subject. But it&#039;s a bloody 360 pages long!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8047" rel="nofollow">@Todd Gaylor </a><br />
Dear Todd, I read this book long time ago and I have to say it&#8217;s well written and can deepen your understanding of this subject. But it&#8217;s a bloody 360 pages long!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Gaylor</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-8047</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Gaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-8047</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if the book Gentile times Reconsiderd was worth it for me to buy. I always had my doubts about the Gentile times theory until I read the book Crisis of Conscience. There I learned that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 rather than 607.

Ironically this changed my veiw. It is pretty obvious from the scriputres alone indicate that Gentile Rule began about 20 years before Jerusalem was destroyed. 20 years before the temple was destroyed Josiah was killed and the Nations set up vassal kings over Judah. There had never been a Sovereign ruler over Judah again and Nebachadnezzar began desolating Isreal. This would mean that if Russel was right and  Jerusalme was destroyed in 607  Gentile rule would have begun 627. I saw a whole in Russels theory. Then I read the book Crisis of Conscience and find out that Jeruslame was destroyed 587 which of course means Gentile Rule would have begun in 607. Now I&#039;m Thininng Russel was right after all. He was right that Gentile Rule began in 607 and merely wrong when the Temple was destroyed.

So I&#039;m wondering if this book is worth buying. Is it just going ot galvanize my faith by proving that the Temple was destroyed in 587? Something I already beleive.
Todd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if the book Gentile times Reconsiderd was worth it for me to buy. I always had my doubts about the Gentile times theory until I read the book Crisis of Conscience. There I learned that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587 rather than 607.</p>
<p>Ironically this changed my veiw. It is pretty obvious from the scriputres alone indicate that Gentile Rule began about 20 years before Jerusalem was destroyed. 20 years before the temple was destroyed Josiah was killed and the Nations set up vassal kings over Judah. There had never been a Sovereign ruler over Judah again and Nebachadnezzar began desolating Isreal. This would mean that if Russel was right and  Jerusalme was destroyed in 607  Gentile rule would have begun 627. I saw a whole in Russels theory. Then I read the book Crisis of Conscience and find out that Jeruslame was destroyed 587 which of course means Gentile Rule would have begun in 607. Now I&#8217;m Thininng Russel was right after all. He was right that Gentile Rule began in 607 and merely wrong when the Temple was destroyed.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m wondering if this book is worth buying. Is it just going ot galvanize my faith by proving that the Temple was destroyed in 587? Something I already beleive.<br />
Todd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-720</guid>
		<description>From what WT did you take the information from ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what WT did you take the information from ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 607</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>607</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>In secular chronology, the destruction of Solomon’s temple was placed in 588 BCE. This is an error, the correct is 607 BCE. The strongest evidence that confirms the accuracy of 607 BCE is its connection to Israel’s restoration in 1948 CE. Concerning this, the law of God recorded in Exodus 21:1,2 says to Israel, “if thou buy an Hebrew servant, 6 years he shall serve: and in the 7th he shall go out free for nothing.” Since the law does not involve the land, it takes effect immediately after Israel’s departure in Egypt. Israel leave Egypt on Nisan of year 1513 BCE, thus if numbered beginning on that year, then its first year will fall between 1512 to 1511. Its first ‘week of years’ points to 1505 to 1504, while its 129th week corresponds to 609, and will end in 608. (7x129=903-1512=609) On that year (609-608) Nebuchadnezzar&#039;s siege of Jerusalem was already advancing. Upon knowing that the said year fell to the year where God&#039;s commandment saying &quot;...at the end of 7 years let ye go every man his brother an Hebrew, which hath been sold unto thee...&quot; was supposed to be observed, Zedekiah (the then reigning king in God’s people) hoping that God will save them from their enemy issued a decree calling all his people to release their servants in obedience to God&#039;s will. (Jeremiah 34:8-10)

True to Zedekiah&#039;s expectation, God&#039; caused the Babylonian to depart from Jerusalem by sending against them an army of the Egyptians who came to rescue Jerusalem. (Jeremiah 37:5) But afterwards, seeing the Babylonians already left, Zedekiah and his princes &quot;caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free to return and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids,&quot; to provoke God to anger. (Jeremiah 34:14-16) In so doing, God declared a punitive liberty to his people: “Therefore thus saith the LORD, Ye have not hearkened unto me, in proclaiming liberty, every one to his brother, and every man to his neighbour: behold, I proclaim a liberty for you, saith the LORD, to the sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine; and I will make you to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.” (Jeremiah 34:13-17,21,22)

The payment for Israel’s sin according to Leviticus 26:18 is ‘7 times.’ The phrase ‘times’ mean years, so 7 times is 7 years. 1 year is 365 days, so 7 years are 2555 days. But in reckoning the sin of his people God used ‘a day for a year’ basis. (Ezekiel 4:6) So 2,555 days mean 2,555 years. If these length of years were reckoned starting from the day when the &#039;week of years&#039; they defiled has expired (609-608), then the first year of the accounting will fall to 607 BCE and will be completed in 1948 CE, (2,555-607=1948) the time when Israel was restored. Some Bible scholars preferred the lunar calendar, thus 7x360=2,520-607=1913. There is no argument here, Jeremiah 16:18 speaks of Israel’s sin to be recompense ‘double’ hence, the first recompensation ends in 1913, while the second one, on 1948. Thus, confirmed 607 BCE

http://finishedmystery.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In secular chronology, the destruction of Solomon’s temple was placed in 588 BCE. This is an error, the correct is 607 BCE. The strongest evidence that confirms the accuracy of 607 BCE is its connection to Israel’s restoration in 1948 CE. Concerning this, the law of God recorded in Exodus 21:1,2 says to Israel, “if thou buy an Hebrew servant, 6 years he shall serve: and in the 7th he shall go out free for nothing.” Since the law does not involve the land, it takes effect immediately after Israel’s departure in Egypt. Israel leave Egypt on Nisan of year 1513 BCE, thus if numbered beginning on that year, then its first year will fall between 1512 to 1511. Its first ‘week of years’ points to 1505 to 1504, while its 129th week corresponds to 609, and will end in 608. (7&#215;129=903-1512=609) On that year (609-608) Nebuchadnezzar&#8217;s siege of Jerusalem was already advancing. Upon knowing that the said year fell to the year where God&#8217;s commandment saying &#8220;&#8230;at the end of 7 years let ye go every man his brother an Hebrew, which hath been sold unto thee&#8230;&#8221; was supposed to be observed, Zedekiah (the then reigning king in God’s people) hoping that God will save them from their enemy issued a decree calling all his people to release their servants in obedience to God&#8217;s will. (Jeremiah 34:8-10)</p>
<p>True to Zedekiah&#8217;s expectation, God&#8217; caused the Babylonian to depart from Jerusalem by sending against them an army of the Egyptians who came to rescue Jerusalem. (Jeremiah 37:5) But afterwards, seeing the Babylonians already left, Zedekiah and his princes &#8220;caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free to return and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids,&#8221; to provoke God to anger. (Jeremiah 34:14-16) In so doing, God declared a punitive liberty to his people: “Therefore thus saith the LORD, Ye have not hearkened unto me, in proclaiming liberty, every one to his brother, and every man to his neighbour: behold, I proclaim a liberty for you, saith the LORD, to the sword, to the pestilence, and to the famine; and I will make you to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.” (Jeremiah 34:13-17,21,22)</p>
<p>The payment for Israel’s sin according to Leviticus 26:18 is ‘7 times.’ The phrase ‘times’ mean years, so 7 times is 7 years. 1 year is 365 days, so 7 years are 2555 days. But in reckoning the sin of his people God used ‘a day for a year’ basis. (Ezekiel 4:6) So 2,555 days mean 2,555 years. If these length of years were reckoned starting from the day when the &#8216;week of years&#8217; they defiled has expired (609-608), then the first year of the accounting will fall to 607 BCE and will be completed in 1948 CE, (2,555-607=1948) the time when Israel was restored. Some Bible scholars preferred the lunar calendar, thus 7&#215;360=2,520-607=1913. There is no argument here, Jeremiah 16:18 speaks of Israel’s sin to be recompense ‘double’ hence, the first recompensation ends in 1913, while the second one, on 1948. Thus, confirmed 607 BCE</p>
<p><a href="http://finishedmystery.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://finishedmystery.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watchtowerinformationservice.org/index.php/books-book-reviews/the-gentile-times-reconsidered-by-carl-olof-jonsson/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Hi again James,

Yep 100% correct. Pity Doos, (a Dutch word for box, or more explicidly in Afrikaans an empty box), funny how believers in Joe and Son (prince of peace) can instantly turn loony tune crazy as soon as they are approached and told their precious belief is held in contempt by others. What makes it more frustrating for these good folk, is that when they turn to their fairy tale book, it offers comfort only to those with blinkers, yes yes eat some more crap, God is good, grovel in the dirt God will save you, grovel some more Jesus will save you,
no matter how little money you have, the church will accept a donation, the less you have the more a donation will it count, remember the well designed parable.

Better start selling Watchtowers, only 18 months left.
Makes me sick, should make Doos sick too, sadly he will soldier on until his life is depleted, what a waste.

Cheers,
Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again James,</p>
<p>Yep 100% correct. Pity Doos, (a Dutch word for box, or more explicidly in Afrikaans an empty box), funny how believers in Joe and Son (prince of peace) can instantly turn loony tune crazy as soon as they are approached and told their precious belief is held in contempt by others. What makes it more frustrating for these good folk, is that when they turn to their fairy tale book, it offers comfort only to those with blinkers, yes yes eat some more crap, God is good, grovel in the dirt God will save you, grovel some more Jesus will save you,<br />
no matter how little money you have, the church will accept a donation, the less you have the more a donation will it count, remember the well designed parable.</p>
<p>Better start selling Watchtowers, only 18 months left.<br />
Makes me sick, should make Doos sick too, sadly he will soldier on until his life is depleted, what a waste.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

